Talk:Percy Henn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Percy Henn has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Under Discussion
Version 0.7
 This article has been nominated to be held or failed based on its importance or quality, respectively, and is undergoing discussion at this page Feel free to comment here, but only the Review Team can vote.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Flag
Portal
 Percy Henn is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments

Contents

[edit] GA nom

This one isn't quite up to GA standards yet, see my peer review for reasoning.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't know who assessed this but there is no way it is up to B-class, more like start.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Reverted pending discussion. My understanding is that Henn is a fairly obscure figure for which little information is available. Thus, even though the article is short, everything seems to have been covered, and there are no key elements missing. I should think it would prove useful to the majority to people visiting in search of information on Henn. Hence B would seem most appropriate per Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment#Quality scale. Hesperian 02:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I see.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 08:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] legacy

There's a Henn close in Winthrop, Western Australia since winthrop is associated with UWA I wonder whether HEnn close is named after Percy Henn. The question is where to find such information to provide a cite for its inclusion in the article. Gnangarra 08:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

I guess there would be a source in the UWA library... Seventy dot 03:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA

Feel free to resubmit it if you think it qualifies. I don't review the same articles twice, see what someone else thinks.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Though I must say the concerns I noted were more the enough reason to fail it, GA criteria 1 is "well written" and GA criteria 4 is NPOV, both of which were concerns I noted on my peer review. I would definitely address those if I were the one resubmitting it, just my two cents.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
When I reviewed the GACriteria, I didn't think NPOV was a problem... but I'm looking for any suggestion. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Those weasel words was all I noted...anyway, on that, mostly the prose was my concern, I have made a couple additional notes on the peer review. Like I said I won't be the one reviewing it next time (because I thnk articles get better and better the more eyes that look at them) but I am willing to point out anything I notice, I won't mess with geographic locales, promise, I'll just mention if something is confusing here or on the review page. : )A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Resubmission

I am relisting the article for GA review. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Version 0.7

This article falls outside the scope of this next release. However, it will be automatically considered for later, larger releases. Walkerma 04:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Automated peer review 1

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Auroranorth (!) 10:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, I have completed the suggestions shown here. Auroranorth (!) 10:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GAR

This article is being brought to WP:GAR. Auroranorth (!) 11:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article: pass

It meets the criteria so it gets a pass, but there are a two things I would like to see work on:

  • Grammatical and MoS errors. I corrected as many as I saw going through, but keep an eye out for proper formatting and writing in this article.
  • It is a very short article. It doesn't appear to omit anything major, but I would definitely like to see more detailed content.

Good job. Let me know if there are any problems or questions. Dylan (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)