Talk:Nin Jiom Pei Pa Koa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject on Alternative Medicine. Please visit the project page for more details, or ask questions on talk.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in China may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] This article is not encyclopedic

See Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations) for guidelines relating to products and services, which quite clearly are not met by this articles. Authors wishing to remove the deletion tag should state how the articles meets the criteria stated on the aforementioned page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffeeflower (talkcontribs)

Please sign your posts, and don't be snarky. The subject of this article is notable, and the article explains why. I have expanded the article and added references including to the Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce and a published pharmacological study. Also, I have removed Prod for the third time now. If you still think the article should be deleted, please use AFD - the act of removing Prod is contesting it and it should not be put back. Quarl (talk) 2006-10-07 21:24Z
First, I concede that with the changes made to the article, my initial point is no longer valid. However, your initial "act" of removing Prod seemed incidental to the minor edits you made, as there was no reflection of this in your edit summary. Therefore, I reinstated it. I did not consider this contested. Second, you are clearly taking this personally, as I do not recall making any "snarky" comments. The omission of a signature on my post is moot, as there is no anonymity; check the page history and you'll clearly see who wrote the comment. I would still recommend placing data about Nin Jiom Pei Pa Koa within an article about Nin Jiom Medicine Manufactory Limited, This is more in line with guidelines on the page notability page I cited earlier. scott a 09:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Normally I would agree that a company's products should be merged into the company's article. However, in this case the "product" came a hundred years before the company, and the company primarily exists for this one product. Quarl (talk) 2006-10-08 09:35Z