Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

中華
WikiProject China
Main Navigation
(edit · changes)
Tools  (edit)
Workgroups (edit)
Departments (edit)
Chinese article statistics

This list is automatically updated every night around 3 AM (UTC)

Shortcuts:
WP:ZH1
WP:ZH1.0

Article assessments are specified using the {{WPCHINA}} project banner, and can be seen in the sub-categories of Category:China-related articles by quality and Category:China-related articles by importance. Summaries are in Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/China-related articles by quality.

To add an article to WikiProject China, add {{WPCHINA}} to the talk page. Any member of WikiProject China is free to add or update the rating of an article. If you are in doubt or disagree about a rating please bring it up for discussion on our talk page.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/China-related articles by quality log is a a full log of rating changes over the past thirty days. For an overview see the statistics.

Contents

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WPCHINA}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):

{{WPCHINA| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

WikiProject China does not use the A-Class designation.

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed China-related articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

[edit] Quality scale

Article progress grading scheme [  v • d • e  ]
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}		 Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
Featured list FL
{{FL-Class}}		 Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured lists" status, and meet the current criteria for featured lists. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough list; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further additions are necessary unless new published information has come to light, but further improvements to the text are often possible. FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives (as of January 2008)
A
{{A-Class}}		 Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
Good article GA
{{GA-Class}}		 The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, or excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}		 Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Jammu and Kashmir (as of October 2007) has a lot of helpful material but needs more prose content and references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}		 The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}		 The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)


Article importance grading scheme
Label Criteria Examples
Top Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. High probability that non-Chinese would look this up. When giving this rating to an article, try to check with other members of WikiProject China on our talk page. Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
High Subject contributes a depth of knowledge to the encyclopedia. Pinyin
Mid Subject fills in more minor details, and may have been included primarily to achieve comprehensive coverage of another topic. Chinese Rites controversy
Low Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial. Yuan (surname)

[edit] Participants

Please feel free to add your name to this list if you would like to join the assessment team

  1. AQu01rius (talk · contribs)
  2. Blootix (talk · contribs)
  3. Danaman5 (talk · contribs)
  4. Durzatwink (talk · contribs)
  5. Ideogram (talk · contribs)
  6. Kyle.Mullaney (talk · contribs)
  7. Redcloud822 (talk · contribs)
  8. Sarcelles (talk · contribs)
  9. Ksyrie (talk · contribs)

[edit] Example assessments

To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.

Quality

  • {{WPCHINA|class=FA}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=A}} - to rate an article at A-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=GA}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=B}} - to rate an article at B-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=Start}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
  • {{WPCHINA|class=Stub}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
  • {{WPCHINA}} - to leave the article un-assessed.

Importance

  • {{WPCHINA|importance=Top}} - to rate an article at Top importance
  • {{WPCHINA|importance=High}} - to rate an article at High importance
  • {{WPCHINA|importance=Mid}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
  • {{WPCHINA|importance=Low}} - to rate an article at Low importance

[edit] Statistics

China-related
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 7 9 14 7 37
Good article GA 11 9 5 6 31
B 161 112 149 43 20 485
Start 143 363 504 367 449 1826
Stub 12 338 616 1032 1104 3102
List 174 174
Assessed 334 831 1288 1455 1747 5655
Unassessed 2 8712 8714
Total 334 833 1288 1455 10459 14369

[edit] By workgroup

Chinese history
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 3 4 2 9
Good article GA 8 2 10
B 13 13 35 2 63
Start 10 19 62 10 54 155
Stub 17 44 31 289 381
List 3 3
Assessed 26 61 145 43 346 621
Unassessed 57 57
Total 26 61 145 43 403 678
Chinese politics
articles		 Importance
High Mid Low None Total
Quality
B 3 2 1 6
Stub 1 1
Assessed 3 2 1 1 7
Total 3 2 1 1 7
Chinese cities
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1
B 12 12
Start 25 9 2 36
Stub 2 6 22 1 31
Assessed 38 2 15 24 1 80
Total 38 2 15 24 1 80
Chinese provinces
articles		 Importance
Top Total
Quality
B 15 15
Start 11 11
Assessed 26 26
Total 26 26
Chinese cinema
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 1 1 1 3
B 5 4 4 13 26
Start 3 17 63 115 198
Stub 17 458 300 775
List 33 33
Assessed 1 8 39 526 461 1035
Total 1 8 39 526 461 1035
Modern Chinese music
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
Featured article FA 2 1 3
Good article GA 1 1
B 1 6 1 5 13
Start 5 18 20 13 4 60
Stub 3 3 28 95 8 137
List 35 35
Assessed 9 29 49 115 47 249
Unassessed 1 1 44 46
Total 9 29 50 116 91 295

[edit] Non-article pages

China-related
non-article pages		 Type
Class
Disambiguation Redirect Template Category Image List Portal Other Total
Total 26 10 48 33 12 94 6 22 251