User talk:Mythdon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] AFD

Deletion is not a method for trying to work with the name of an article. It's for deciding whether or not an article should be included on Wikipedia. If you think that it should have a different name, then we work on that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Whats done is done. I already placed the afd, The communinty will decide on this afd. Mythdon (talk) 05:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
But the title of the page is not what the community decides at AFD. AFD is for determining inclusion. Not whether or not a name is official.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Although that may be the nomination reason, i will sit back and see what the communities reasons are for saying Keep or Delete. Like i said, whats done is done. Mythdon (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ==Unconstructive Edit==

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

An edit summary is where the editor explains the reasoning behind the change. Simply putting "No." leaves no room for discussion, or avenue of forming a consensus with other editors. If you disagree, post a better explanation than "No." and use the Talk page if more room is required. Read WP:edit summary for more information. TRTX (talk) 04:55, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

TRTX, stop making a big deal out of my edit. Also, saying im making unconstructive edits is basically telling me im vandalizing Wikipedia, so do not tell me the edit was not marked as vandalism. Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism. Mythdon (talk) 05:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Your edit summary was not sufficient explanation, and I saw no further discussion regarding the change in the talk page. That is why I posted the form response you have deleted twice (actively bolding the section regarding edit summary so you would see it). Also, I'd like to ask that you please stop removing my post from the talk page requesting clarification of another users's changes. That is something that's considered poor ettiquette per WP:Talk TRTX (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I can remove your post off of that talk page all i want as it does not involve discussing changes. Also, the post was directed at Ryulong so i suggest you post that on his talk page instead. Mythdon (talk) 05:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
How does it not discuss changes? Ryulong specifcally said "We are waiting...", which implies a consensus was reached at some point. So I'm simply asking for some clarification regarding this consensus and its effect on the proposed change. It is directly related to the article at hand. Posting it to Ryulong's talk page exclusively shuts out other potential editors from gaining a better understanding of the reasoning behind certain changes. TRTX (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk page posts should not be directed specifically to certain users so i removed the post. Mythdon (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] Deletion of talk post

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

A talk page is not a place to edit other users content. Again, please see WP:Talk to get a better understanding. Also, your tiptoeing on WP:3RR in regards to blocking my attempts to open a discussion regarding a potential change. TRTX (talk) 05:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I was not editing your content on the talk page, i was deleting it. There is nowhere in WP:Talk that says do not remove peoples comments. Mythdon (talk) 05:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
From WP:Talk -
  • Discuss edits: The talk page is particularly useful to talk about edits. If one of your edits has been reverted, and you change it back again, it is good practice to leave an explanation on the talk page and a note in the edit summary that you have done so. The talk page is also the place to ask about another editor's changes. If someone queries one of your edits, make sure you reply with a full, helpful rationale.
Which is exactly what I was doing. TRTX (talk) 05:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Now i understand. Mythdon (talk) 05:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
But, you should also know is that talk page posts are allowed to be removed by others on circumstances. Mythdon (talk) 05:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] Youtube

Since i asked multiple users on Wikipedia if they are the same person as they are on Youtube. I have put this up on my talk page now. If you want to reply here, go ahead.

The following users were asked.

  1. Ryulong
  2. Arrowned
  3. Myzou -- Yes, that is me, I used to have Myzou, but the account was banned for uploading Super Sentai stuff -.- Myzou (talk) 11:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. RangerKing
  5. Rmssw
  6. Fractyl

Mythdon (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that is me. Rmssw (talk) 11:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jungle Fury Power Rangers

Please do not revert this article again, this will get you in three revert trouble, and you may end up blocked. Instead, offer your case on the article talk page, and we can discuss the matter. J Milburn (talk) 23:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please refrain from editing my user page

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

If you have an issue with a particular change I made, please take up this issue in either the article's talk page or my talk page. This would be a preferred means of communication, as opposed to making unconstructive edits to my user page. Thank you. TRTX (talk) 20:15, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

You have no right to me i cant edit your user page, because users do not own there user pages. The users user page is just associated with them. You should also read through WP:OWN. Also, the edit i did was not unconstructive in any way, shape or form. Mythdon (talk) 20:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

[edit] Power Rangers

You're right, I actually used the wrong rationale; but I still don't think it's suitable for WP. I have never seen another list like this on here simply because it just isn't really a good idea for an article, I don't think... As I say in the AfD nom I have no problem with the inclusion of some of the more important name (Exec Producers, etc) but to list a whole heap of cast members isn't really advisable. Note: your comments would be better served at the AfD nom rather than on my talk page; feel free to air your concerns there. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 01:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WP:RFPP

Hello - just a quickie. For future reference, new reports go at the top of the list. I know it gets a bit confusing as various pages appear to have various approaches. I've taken the liberty of moving your request to the top, and semi-protected the page for 3 days. Thanks! GBT/C 21:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Comparisons

For starters, it's a very poor representation of the comparisons between the four Sim games (The Sims/Online/2/3) as the differences between these games have been better explained elsewhere (for example, see the body of The Sims 2 article). Also, the table consists merely of one's very narrow-mnided perception of what makes the four games different to one another (as much, if not all of it is based on original research and speculation). And don't get me started on spelling errors. :P All I'm saying is that the differences between these games cannot be properly represented in a table, and that it is unnecessary given the sum of its faults. Sillygostly (talk) 00:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] When to delete talk posts, and when not to

Hi. We had this conversation before, but you appear still eager to do this. While editors are allowed on occasion to delete talk posts, it's usually only reserved for situations when a post is far off topic (such as general discussion of the topic vs. article content). While my post may not have been directly related to the article, it was in relation to something I saw thanks to the work you did pulling several article titles into one place. While it may not be the best place, it's far quicker to ask the question in the topic at hand than to go to each article's talk page and post there in the hopes that one of them get's noticed. Instead of deleting the post, a better response would've been something similar to how Ryulong responded to your Power Morpher post in the same talk page [[1]]. I am interested in discussing a change that would effect multiple pages, and am not sure where that would go. But I would be more than happy to discuss it in the appropriate place if somebody can redirect me, which won't happen if you simply delete the post. TRTX T / C 03:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I removed your post because the post was not on the sections topic (as in what was being discussed in the section). I did not care whether you made the post or not, it is where you posted it (as in talk page section) on the talk page, that is why i removed the post. If you want to make this post again, please do so by starting a new section. Mythdon (talk) 03:32, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Just a suggestion for next time: You should probably follow the above example I posted from the same talk page, or simply move the offending post to a new section. Editors are allowed to do this as well. And it's generally preferred over an outright comment delete. Especially when the offending post isn't as much "off topic" as it is "wrong topic" TRTX T / C 03:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archives

Mythdons talk pages and archives
Current
Talk page
Archives
Archive 1 (Dec 07 - Jan 08) • Archive 2 (Jan 08 - Mar 08)
Archive combos