Talk:Musical film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B
This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High
This article has been rated as High-importance on the priority scale.

[edit] Musical Film vs Music film

Movies that include singing/dancing in relatively realistic settings, such as stories about musicians are generally not considered musicals. Generally, the music must be a fantastical event to qualify. See IMDB's rules on the subject. http://akas.imdb.com/updates/guide/genres I prose a new Music film article. Ace of Sevens 13:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately IMDB's classification is a real mess. For example, they classify The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle, Three Little Words, and Till the Clouds Roll By as musical films although each one is a biography (of Vernon and Irene Castle, Bert Kalmar and Harry Ruby, and Jerome Kern respectively). They classify The Glenn Miller Story as a film biography (not a music film) and The Fabulous Dorseys as a biography and music film. So you see they are completely inconsistent. Please give concrete examples of films you would consider to be "Music Films" and not musical films. A more practical approach might be to use Musical Film Biography as a sub-genre to classify musicals based on real life composers, musicians, singers or entertainers. And let's not forget, most of the musical film biographies made by Hollywood were substantially fictionalised treatments anyway.Dermot 12:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Dermot

Dermot...agreed! Besides there will always be movies that defy attempts to classify them as proposed above by the Ace. Look at the recent De-Lovely which is a bio of Cole Porter and has both perfectly realistic musical numbers, and also fantasy numbers. I doubt that Louis B. Mayer ever broke out into song and dance with Cole Porter while walking around the studio lot!

Tex 15:39, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

I disagree with Ace of Sevens. Most film and musical scholars would include all of the above under musical, although I agree with the use of subgenres to classify them further. "Fantastical event" is not a precise definition; does this mean diegetic music with no visible diegetic source? But that occurs in many musical biographies as well those with a "fantastical" plotline. And where does that put musical realism vs. the backstage musical vs. completely fantastic premise (e.g. Finian's Rainbow')? IMDB is a mess and should not be used as a model!

Why not adopt the inclusive approach of one of the several fine encyclopedias on the topic, for instance Thomas Hischak's Film It With Music: An Encyclopedic Guide to the American Movie Musical (Greewood Press, 2001)? Hischak admits that the inclusion process was difficult, but states that "films with plenty of dance but little song . . . and movies with their scores heard more than seen performed . . . must be considered because that is what the movies musical evolved into in the late 1970s." (x)

The film Cabaret (film) is generally classified as a musical. I would not say that the songs are fantastical events, as they are part of the films night club setting. They are however a large part of the narrative. --87.127.117.246 11:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I've had a discussion/argument with a Musical Director as to what constitutes a musical: The controversial (between us, anyway) examples i'm shooting for here are The Nightmare Before Christmas, South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut, and Moulin Rouge!. They have musical numbers, they are based on fantastical events, they have soundtracks, dance routines, and had scores were written for each (even if they are not publicly available). But do they count as 'proper' musicals? They have no stage production, and they are not split into acts! I would expand it to includes musical episodes of Scrubs and the like, but that would just be silly. JaffaCakeLover (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Non-musical films

According to one line in The musical film today, "In the early 2000s, the musical film began to rise in popularity once more…even [with] film versions of stage shows that were themselves based on non-musical films, such as The Producers, Hairspray and Sweeney Todd."

Um…The Producers and Hairspray are based off of films that are very much musical, and Sweeney Todd isn't even based on a film (though, yes, there are earlier film versions of the urban legend of Sweeney Todd). The only musical that fits this category, in fact, would be The Phantom of the Opera, which is largely based off of The Phantom of the Opera (1925 film).

The Man in Question (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed tag

This article has been tagged as disputed for some time, but it is not clear why. I recommend either that the tag be removed, or that we list the exact disputed details here at talk. Anyone have an opinion? --Elonka 10:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

The tag was added in June 2006, disputing the defintion of a musical film "The musical film is a film genre in which several songs sung by the characters are interwoven into the narrative. The songs are usually used to advance the plot or develop the film's characters." I can't see anything wrong with that explanation. Remove the tag. Thuresson (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)