Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Miranda/notebook

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Snowball keep in a speedy fashion. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Miranda/notebook

This is an "evidence" page compiled as part of some feud Miranda seems to be carrying on against Justinm1978. It's been hanging around for over a week now. It originally started as a full-blown request of banning but has fizzled into something resembling an RFC. This sort of thing in user space wouldn't be bothersome she was working on it quietly; but instead, it's been shopped around quite a bit in an apparent attempt to get others to pile on beforehand. I request that this and the related page User:Miranda/notebook2 be deleted as an inappropriate use of user space with no prejudice to the creation of an actual RFC. ➪HiDrNick! 06:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, when I attempt to have a wikibreak, and admit that I was going to be busy in real life, and would file the RFC for later... Next time, "Dr. Nick", please do this, which leads to doing this, instead of doing this. Thanks. miranda 07:04, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
FYI: Precedent. miranda 07:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Dubious, "Miranda". The only incomming link to that page is the MFD for it. The_undertow was not canvasing that userpage about. ➪HiDrNick! 18:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Snowball Keep userspace is very often used like this before things such as an RfC, or even arbcom. -- Ned Scott 07:07, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. No reason to delete; people do this all the time. It's almost like she seems to be preparing evidence. Celarnor Talk to me 07:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep As Ned Scott said, this is what userspace is for. Where else is she going to write it? APK yada yada 17:42, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep and close this MfD. Subpages are harmless, nearly invisible unless trolling contributions, and completely allowed when building evidence for a future action. Miranda is a dedicated user that is smart enough to use her subpages appropriately, and smart enough to have them deleted when they are no longer needed. Speedy close to avoid embarassment for the nominator. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
    • Don't worry about embarasing me; this doesn't bother me at all.  :-) If the page were difficult to find, indeed, there would not be a problem at all. However, it's not hard to find. A WhatLinksHere search shows that the page is being used to round up a posse for a banning. I was under the impression that the forum for this sort of thing was RFC, where the editor in question is given a chance to defend themselves. Instead, the editor under attack is maintaining a seperate rebuttal page. ➪HiDrNick! 18:01, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
(ec) Once again, she is preparing it for RfC. The editor being "attacked" will be able to defend himself when she's posts the RfC. Besides, he started on his rebuttal the day after she created her notebook page. APK yada yada 18:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
(ec) First of all, the editor isn't "under attack". Evidence against the editor is being compiled for presentment to RFC. The editor in question will be given the chance to defend himself once the actual RFC is opened. You can't open an RFC without evidence and where else would you presume Miranda compile the evidence before filing the RFC, an off-Wiki spiral notebook? Seriously. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 18:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.