Talk:Mister Majestic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): DC Comics work group

Contents 1 Majestic Creators 2 Most Powerful? 3 Expert 4 Suggestion for improvement 5 Cleanup done 6 Excess of "Citation needed" 7 Fair use rationale for Image:Majestic02.jpg

[edit] Majestic Creators

I know jim lee had a hand in creating Mr. Majestic, but I don't believe brandon choi did anything (thusly I edited his name out of the article, to be added later if im wrong). In issue #11 of the orginal wildcats, Majestic first appeared in a backup story written by H.K. proger. The main story in the issue was by Chris Claremont. Is there any proof Choi even had any connection to the characters creation? Midusunknown 10:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Most Powerful?

Labelling Majestic "the" most powerful, as opposed to "one of the" most powerful, is a little bit uncertain. At the very least, the Doctor is arguably a peer in capability ( unless you don't consider him a genuine hero; putting that condition in play *really* narrows the pool. . . ).

• I agree. --Strannik 22:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Expert

Someone who is an expert on this character, please spend some time on this article. Thanks in advance.

Lots42 21:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Suggestion for improvement

If anyone has access to the issue, a brief summary of Majestic being one of the last survivors of all time and space would be a neat addition to the article. Lots42 05:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cleanup done

I've done some major clean-up of the article; it started out as just removing past tense references, but quickly took on a larger aspect. I removed a lot of text that was redundant or not really part of the article subject. I also added a lot of cn tags (which do not challenge the accuracy of the information, but merely need anchoring within the continuity); they should not be removed without properly cited references.

I think that the article still needs a lot of trimming. Someone should clear up the interchangeability/operability of using Mr. Majestic. Majestic and Magestros in the article. As I ma not intimately familiar with the comics, i found the use of different names a bit confusing. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Excess of "Citation needed"

Does anyone know why there are "Citation needed" signs all over this article? Some appear at points where a footnote in the bibliography would be nice, but many of them seem to be next to just random words. I've tried editing this out three times, but it keeps bouncing back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrpelt (talk • contribs) 00:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Majestic02.jpg

Image:Majestic02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)