User talk:Milorad Pavlovic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Milorad Pavlovic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

-- Longhair | Talk 08:31, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Vračar

Milorade, poštovanje! Uočio sam da si bio aktivan na člancima koji se mahom tiču Beograda. I primetio sam da si stavljao neke slike na članak Vračar, međutim neke slike ne odgovaraju tom članku. Izmeđuostalih tu su slike koje je neko (verovatno ti) fotografisao na Zelenom vencu i oko njega. Pijaca na Zelenom vencu, kao i Ruski dom se ne nalaze na Vračaru, već na Starom gradu. Očekum tvoju ispravku povodom ovoga i pozivam te da sudeluješ na Vikipediji na srpskom jeziku. Pozdrav, i sve najbolje! --M. Pokrajac 21:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Lepo je saznati nešto novo o istoriji Beograda. Ipak, Vikipedija je encikopedija koja opisuje realno stanje na terenu sa principijelnim poštovanjem neutralne tačke gledišta. Znači, ti ni u kom slučaju ne smeš reći da se Zeleni venac ili Ruski dom nalaze na Vračaru, jer to nije istina. To bi isto bilo kada bi rekli da je Vojvodina u Mađarskoj, zato što je ona njena vekovna teritorija bila sve do 1918. Očekum da shvatiš realnost i izbrišeš netačnu informaciju da je Zeleni venac na Vračaru. Podatak da je nekada pripadao Vračaru, dakako treba napisati negde, ali ne i to da je na Vračaru sada! Pozdrav, --M. Pokrajac 14:34, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Moram priznati da mi nije baš sve jasno ovo poslednje što si uradio, odnisno napisao na mojoj stranici za razgovor i na članku Vracar. Nisi trebao tako impulsivno da odreaguješ. Ja se nisam naučen rodio i ne znam SVE! Trebao si da vratiš ono što misliš da je istinito sa obrazloženjem, a ne sve da brišeš pobogu! Na Vikipediji pokušavam da budem fleksibilan i priznam očite činjenice. Vratio sam tvoj odlični članak! Ako sam administrator, ne mora značiti da sam gospodin Sveznalić! Suština Vikipedije je da ljudi sarađuju i komuniciraju argumentima. Pozdrav i ajde napiši članak o Vračaru na srpskoj Vikipediji! -M. Pokrajac 18:00, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mihajlo Bath.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mihajlo Bath.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. --Shanel 17:22, September 11, 2005 (UTC) Also Image:Min1838.jpg

[edit] Image:Prince Mihailo Cottage.jpg

Hi, thanks for uploading Image:Prince Mihailo Cottage.jpg. I presume it is taken by you and you have released it under GFDL, so I tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}}. If this is correct, you may go to the image description page and replace the tag with {{GFDL}}. Thanks. –Mysid (talk) 07:31, September 12, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Vracarskabanka.jpg

Warning sign
This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Vracarskabanka.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (T | C) 08:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Slavija2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Slavija2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)