User talk:Mewtwowimmer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

please stop

Please stop changing the formatting of the number-ones pages. If you're going to make big, sweeping changes to the page, discuss it on the Talk Page first. Number ones lists are set up in this format from 1940 to the present, for albums, R&B singles, dance singles and rock singles and also for various countries.... they all follow the same formatting. Thanks. -- eo 22:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk: El Salvador

Welcome!

Hello, Mewtwowimmer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

I had one more suggestion for you. You posted the following message to Talk:El Salvador:

  • I'm 13 years old, and I have a nanny who was born in San Rafael, Chalatenango, El Salvador. She's been with my family since my older brother was a few months old. User:Mewtwowimmer 8:28, 31 August 2006 (PCT)

It's great that you have decided to participate in Wikipedia's editing process. Someone with the intelligence you describe on your user page will surely be an asset. However, the message you left doesn't actually serve the purpose of the Talk page. The idea is to discuss ways to improve the article.

For example, if you and your nanny discuss the article and she thinks previous editors left out something important, then what you wrote would make a good introduction to saying, "She was surprised that the article doesn't mention ______. I haven't been successful finding a source to show that this event happened. Does anyone have a suggestion?" Incidentally, you might get her input and work on the articles related to Chalatenango Department in particular. Most of the articles on specific departments are pretty basic, and she might be able to suggest places you could look up on Google and turn into article material. I do that kind of thing with my husband, who is from Morazán.

Good luck! --Lawikitejana 03:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Update: I went back and looked at your contribution list ... WOW! You've done a lot of good updates already, especially for someone who's only been editing six weeks or so. Hope you don't take the "Welcome" message as an insult after all that work! Here's the wikilink for the article on the San Rafael municipality. It's just one sentence long, so any documentable material on San Rafael will be most helpful. --Lawikitejana 04:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Reverted test

Thank you for experimenting with the page My Gym Partner's a Monkey on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Squirepants101 02:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to My Gym Partner's a Monkey. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Squirepants101 15:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ben 10, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Squirepants101 17:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mgpampromo_edited.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mgpampromo_edited.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:11, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Punk rock

Apparently, no one so far has given you a formal warning about your December 20 page move vandalism, moving Punk rock to "Cunt rock". Page move vandalism is a pretty serious offense. Consider this a final warning.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Jmabel | Talk 09:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Your Edit to India

I'm curious to know why you would think India was in the middle east? Seriously. Sfacets 23:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Looking for members to help out with Project Boston

I noticed you are from Boston. I am looking for people to join Project Boston in order to clean up and expand wikipedia articles directly reletated to Boston. If you feel like helping out please join up. Markco1 23:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Your mother must be a great person ;) Markco1 04:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Addition to Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This refers to this edit. If you can find a source for this information, please do. Thank you! --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 03:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

List of programs broadcast by Jetix

This list is getting confusing. Should it just be changed to reflect currently airing programs? --Libertyernie2 17:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Meet the Robinsons

Thank you for your contributions. Your contribution to the page Meet the Robinsons has been determined to contain incorrect information. Editors adding new material should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability for more information about this. Thank you.Rhindle The Red 00:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit to My Gym Partner's a Monkey

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to My Gym Partner's a Monkey. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not add vandalism or misinformation either. Squirepants101 21:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


Are you a Wikipediholic Test

Hi Mewtwowimmer,

I saw you proclaiming yourself as 1st in the Wikipediholic Test. I checked over your contributions, and you only have less than 500 edits, many reverted due to vandalism or not citing your work, from this, your score seemed unbelieveable. The highest possible score is about 1038670, which is 4000000 lower than what you had posted.I suspect cheating from you, in which your score will be reverted. Please discuss this matter at the project's talkpage, or on my talk page.

 Smcafirst | Chit-Chat | SIGN  posted at 19:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

P.S. You will get the elephants! That is, if the score you posted are fake. You are also responsible for posting inappropriate words at the score list.

Your score is now reverted (Unless you have a reasonable explanation at the project's talk page.  Smcafirst | Chit-Chat | SIGN  posted at 19:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
You have just been crushed by an elephant for cheating on the test.
If you think that this capital punishment is unfairly given, then please ask to be uncrushed by the user who gave you this notice.

YuanchosaanSalutations! 10:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Stop

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to My Gym Partner's a Monkey, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. You are certainly not an admin (if you want to be one, go to WP:RFA). Squirepants101 20:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Administrator status

You edited your userpage earlier today by adding a userbox claiming to be an administrator. This edit has been reverted because you are not, in fact, an administrator. Please explain why you added this userbox and agree not to claim to be an admin again (unless, of course, you eventually become one). Thank you, Newyorkbrad 21:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Trolling

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Metros232 00:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

false claims

I've removed several false claims from your user page, such as that you created Wikipedia, and several articles, as well as that you can edit any article 100% correctly and never be reverted. That is patently untrue. Please review WP:OWN. Also, it appears you have a recurring problem with false claims. That is generally not tolerated here on Wikipedia. Continuing to act in an inappropriate manner, contrary to our policies, will result in you being blocked from editing. Since you have received several warnings before this, please consider this your final warning. SWATJester On Belay! 00:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

See my list of contributions. I bet I know a lot.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I've lost my mind! Mewtwowimmer 00:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Stop it!

I have been reverting your edits because they were unsourced and unverifiable. Another reason I've been reverting your edits was because some of it is vandalism (referring to edits made on My Gym Partner's a Monkey in which you changed part of the cast list to include Captain Underpants characters and other kinds of misinformation). If you want your content to stay on Wikipedia, then I'd suggest you provide sources. Like the notes on each edit page state, if you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it. Do not try to be disruptive, either. Squirepants101 23:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Your "long-researched" facts may be considered original research. Squirepants101 23:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I pretty much agree with what Squirepants said. This is an encyclopedia, not a playground. —tregoweth (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr., is considered vandalism and may result in a block. Squirepants101 23:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Your RfA

I have removed your RfA. You cannot simply include your previously closed RfA. You can create a new RfA at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mewtwowimmer 2 but I strongly recommend you do not do that. It is very clear that the community does not consider you ready for adminship, and repeatedly nominating yourself will not have a different outcome at this time and could been seen as disruption. Please take heed of this advice. Thanks, Gwernol 23:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

By the way, your previous RfA says: "The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it." Please follow instructions like this. Editing your previous RfA in that way when directly instructed not to is unacceptable and a good example of why the community is not going to trust you to be an administrator. Sorry, but until you can follow basic instructions, you aren't ready. Gwernol 23:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Final warning

I see you have chosen to ignore my advice and created another RfA. If you include this on RfA I will remove it and block you for disruption. There is no chance your RfA will pass and wasting the community's time by pushing forward with this just a day after your previous request failed is extremely disruptive. Please do not do this. Gwernol 00:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption by persistently requesting adminship despite the obvious feelings of the community. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwernol 00:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Gwernol 00:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was just trying to be helpful. Do you guys not understand me? I was formerly the richest 9 year old on the planet."


Decline reason: "You've been nothing but disruptive lately. Block is totally appropriate to prevent further disruption. — Metros232 01:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Stop vandalizing this page

If you continue to use this page to vandalize and make personal attacks I will extend your block and protect this page to stop your continued disruption. Please understand that you are behaving inappropriately and your continued participation in Wikipedia is hanging by a thread. Gwernol 01:42, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

If Misteroonova is blocked, then so am I!

{{unblock|It looks like Misteroonova uses the same IP address as me. When you blocked Misteroonova, '''I''' was blocked also! Of the two users, only Misteroonova has been contributing frequently since April 1. It was my '''older brother''' who created Misteroonova. Please unblock me.}}

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 216.165.245.57 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: John Reaves (talk) 04:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

SOMEBODY UNBLOCK ME!!!!!

Squirepants101! Jimbo Wales! Swatjester! Tregoweth! Lenin and McCarthy! Pilotguy! Metros232! Angela! Netsnipe! Any administrator! PLEASE! I WAS AUTOBLOCKED!!!!

Vandalism

If you continue to introduce vandalism such as your edits at Meet the Robinsons, American Dog, and Bianca Burke, you will be blocked from editing. Metros232 19:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Metros232. Your creation of the Bianca Burke -> Kelly Ripa redirect was nothing but vandalism. Please stop or you will be facing a substantial block. Your chances of a successful RfA are being seriously damaged by this sort of nonsense. Gwernol 18:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Continued creation of nonsense redirects to Kelly Ripa (Joseph Mateo)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 20 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent disruption. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwernol 23:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Gwernol 23:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I was just on my way to do here the same for vandalism to Meet the Robinsons that you keep introducing. Metros232 23:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Response to "Indefinitely Blocked?"

I am not User:Metros232, but if you need to know what indefinitely blocked means, please read WP:BLOCK#Indefinite_blocks. By the way, I am not an administrator, and even if I was one, I would not unlift your block. Just look at the comments you've been receiving about your edits. Squirepants101 00:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Request for unblock: I've learned a vital lesson: NEVER vandalize!

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Part I: Meet the Robinsons. Well, Andre 3000 would voice Frankie the Frog, but he dropped out to work on Class of 3000. Kelly Ripa would voice Tiny the T-rex, but she had to co-host with Regis Philbin. James Earl Jones would voice a talking apple. Laurie Metcalf would voice the 3 Little Pigs. Adam West would voice a ringmaster. Zach Tyler Eisen would voice Wilbur Robinson. Wayne Knight would voice the Big Bad Wolf. According to the IMDB: It's Uncle Dmitri, not Uncle Dimitri! Ethan Sandler would voice Foof. Steve Anderson would voice some clowns. Tom Kenny's wife, Jill Talley, would voice extra frogs. Denzel Washington, Gary Oldman, Spencer Fox and Steve Zahn were considered for voices, but they couldn't make the final cut. This all came from earlier edits to Meet the Robinsons by various users. Is THAT enough? I hate it when my edits are reverted. I am not Jimmy Wales. I am not Paul Netto. I am not Mewtwo. I am not God. I do not rule the world. Yeesh! Please have the pleasure to unblock me. I think that I've learned an important lesson: NEVER vandalize repeatedly or you will get blocked for good."


Decline reason: "Get to the point please. Why should we unblock you? Please say it in less than 50 words. — 210physicq (c) 22:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Mewtwowimmer 21:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Where is all this information coming from? It's no where to be found on the IMDB website for the movie. So why do you add them all to the cast list? Metros232 21:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Like Metros stated, where are you getting this information from? You sound kind of desperate to be unblocked. Squirepants101 21:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Also, the lesson you should have learned is never vandalize, period. You seem to be more interested in adding your own false information than making useful contributions. —tregoweth (talk) 21:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
You just don't understand. Those characters were going to appear, but they didn't make the final cut. Mewtwowimmer 21:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Says who? There's no sources for this information anywhere. Metros232 21:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I saw a previous version of that page before I added the cast. And yes, my mentor says Andre 3000 appears in the movie. Mewtwowimmer 21:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
"Your mentor" is not a reliable source. You must cite reliable published sources (i.e. not blog pages or a web site you made) that show this is true. Even IMDB is not really reliable. Encyclopedias should only contain information that has been published elsewhere. Someone telling you something is not good enough to include information in an article. Gwernol 22:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Meet the Robertsons - A Thomas Wimmer Production

Here is my planned cast for this movie. I'm the director, writer and producer of the movie.

Mewtwowimmer 21:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

This is exactly the sort of nonsense that you absolutely cannot add to Wikipedia articles. This is clearly something you made up and its cannot be added to any articles. When your block lifts, if you continue to add this kind of nonsense to articles, or you continue to create nonsense redirects to Kelly Ripa you will be blocked for an extended period of time. Gwernol 22:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My sources were the edits at the bottom of this comment. According to the IMDb, after a test screening for John Lasseter, chief creative officer of animation at Disney, he suggested a lot of changes to director Stephen J. Anderson. In the next 10 months prior to the release, nearly 60 percent of the movie was re-rendered, adding new story elements and action scenes as well as a diabolic sidekick."


Decline reason: "You cannot use vandalism to an article as a source to replace that same vandalism in the article. As has been explained to you, a source must be independent and published in a reliable place. IMDB does not list any of the people you mention, and many of the characters don't even apear in the film. You cannot add information you've made up to a Wikipedia article. You will not be unblocked. When your block lifts, if you continue to vandalize you will be blocked for a very long time. Gwernol 00:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Jim Carrey had a choice of voicing the Bowler Hat Guy or play Walter Sparrow in the film "The Number 23", he chose the latter.

The science fair that Wilbur attends is held at Joyce Williams Elementary school. This is a nod to the author of the original story, William Joyce.

Had Andre Benjamin not created Class of 3000, he would have voiced Frankie the Frog.

I have never used any of those IP addresses. Nor did I make that stuff up. Nor did I make the edits above. Yeesh! Mewtwowimmer 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Those edits weren't mine. That made up content was not mine. Those characters didn't even make the final cut."


Decline reason: "Clearly you still do not understand WP:CITE and WP:RS. Please use your time while blocked to read up on these mandatory policies. — Yamla 00:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

The IP addresses credited for these edits; 94030218 and 98628730; weren't mine.

You unblock request has been denied, don't add another unblock request or your block will be extended for disruption. I did not say you made those edits: I said you can't use those as "sources" to justify your vandalism. I told you that you cannot add made up information to articles, this is true even if you didn't make it up. You have been repeatedly told this you cannot make these specific edits and yet you have continued to make them. You are not going to be unblocked. Gwernol 00:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Listen! I said that I had never used those IP addresses.

I'm really getting angry! This is the last straw! If you don't prove that the IP addresses credited for the edits above weren't mine, then I am pernamently signing off of Wikipedia! Do you hear me?! Mewtwowimmer 00:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I think the source I got all the nonsensical data from was deleted. Mewtwowimmer 00:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, then find another reliable source. And don't even dare blackmail us with leaving, because we seriously don't care if you leave after disrupting our processes. —210physicq (c) 01:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Or try Uncyclopedia. You're allowed to make up stuff there. —tregoweth (talk) 06:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I have an account at Uncyclopedia. I would like to strongly apologize for my misbehaviors.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am extremely sorry for repetitive vandalism and sockpuppetry. I have learned an important lesson: Sock puppetry and persistent vandalism would most likely lead to an indefinite block."


Decline reason: "Good. Now take a few weeks for that lesson to sink in. — 210physicq (c) 03:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

And don't post any more unblock requests. They will be subsequently denied and you will lose the ability to edit this page until your block ends. —210physicq (c) 03:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I REALLY NEED TO EDIT WIKIPEDIA AGAIN! GIVE ME ONE LAST CHANCE! I PROMISE I'LL MAKE ONLY USEFUL EDITS! I AM JIMMY WALES! I RULE THE WORLD!"


Decline reason: "Enough of your useless begging and incessant whining. Congratulations, you just lost your right to edit this page until your block is over. — 210physicq (c) 01:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Stop posting these unblock requests. Like Physicq210, they will be denied and you will lose the ability to edit your talk page until the block is over. Do not try to lie either. Squirepants101 00:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

Given your continued use of sockpuppets and non-constructive editing habits, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. If you wish to make one appeal to this block, you may email me and I will place an unblock request here. Given your previous abuse, I will not unprotect the page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 12:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not a vandal!"


Decline reason: "Unblock abuse, continued abuse of sockpuppets. — Yamla 17:36, 27 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.