User talk:Metagraph

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are here regarding a revert I have made to an edit, take a look at it yourself. If it violates any Wikipedia policy, that was why it was reverted. This mainly includes WP:NPOV, WP:NOT, WP:COI, WP:NOTE, and WP:VERIFIABLE. Please read and understand these before requesting a reason. Alternatively, if you are adamant it is not vandalism, use common sense and re-add it.


Contents

[edit] Re: Pavlov

Done - and I've added a few more Pavlovas to the list too :) Grutness...wha? 12:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

You have gotten me confused now. I did mean to reply to you for your message left on my talk page. I have reverted my edit on One-hit wonder. I think it was a reply meant to you, as far as I know. This is what happens when I stay up all night working on Wikipedia. I'm sorry if I'm inconveniencing you. --- Mr. E. Sánchez Wanna know my story?/ Share yours with me! 07:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment


Thank you for your understanding and for not starting a revert war. Have fun editing! Thanks! Mr. E. Sánchez Wanna know my story?/ Share yours with me! 07:06, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] Thanks, but...

If a talk page entry has nothing to do with the article or makes no sense...it will be deleted. -Sukecchi (talk) 11:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Matt (talk)
I reverted it the first time. -Sukecchi (talk) 12:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Replied on your talk page, Matt (talk)

[edit] Shotokan karate

Thanks for using the Shotokan karate box I created. You can change the background color to match your belt by adding |#630 to the end. Take a look at my page for an example. [User:Drmadskills|Drmadskills]] (talk) 18:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

I began karate in January 2006. I'm 1st kyu as well now and I'm hoping I will be able to take my shodan exam in December of this year. Kindest, Drmadskills (talk) 13:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] Vandalism?

ur claiming that stating Russell Crowe as a new zealand-australian is vandalism. You could have edited it back i wouldnt have cared but sending me a message about vadalism is stupid. Your a dickhead, Crowe is an Aussie might i add...and it was sourced. He lived in NZ for 4 years till he moved to Aus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve76859 (talkcontribs) 02:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

No, i warned you because there was an active discussion going on and we don't need people sockpuppetting and changing the article. You know what you did was wrong, and calling me a dickhead isn't solving anything. Sockpuppetting is against the rules, Vandalism is too, and editing without NPOV is also bad. Iv also written more on your talk page, but this is a message here for all the people reading this and wondering what iv done. Metagraph comment
  • Replied on your talk page. Matt (talk)

[edit] Trivia

Thanks for the assistance. Could you perhaps tell TapOut 013 a bit more indepth?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] Battle of Strasbourg

The reason I didn't write summaries is because I was not editing this article, but writing it (it was a 2-paragraph stub when I started on it). There seems little point in adding edit summaries when you're not changing anything but simply expanding, since the new text is its own summary. Also, I'm not sure I like this threat of formal warnings: it seems inappropriate when you are dealing with people that are contributing their time and effort for free. Warnings etc are only appropriate when you are paying people to do work for you. EraNavigator (talk) 21:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] Attack on Ryulong?

Whoa, whoa, whoa, you thought I was attacking him? I was just saying my opinion! I didn't mean to attack anyone. But still, sorry for attacking. SAVIOR_SELF.777 07:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] User:219.89.212.67

The user was blocked for the vandalism to Sydney and for their persistent abuse of their talk page and mine. It was clear that the user was not the Newbie they claimed to be and that their only intention was to vandalize. Gwernol 14:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh and regarding the blanking of their talk page, users are permitted to remove warnings from their tlak page, but IPs may not remove comments of other users nor are they permitted to remove the whois tag since these pages are shared by multiple users. Gwernol 14:46, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] Request For Rollback

Y Done. Please see WP:RBK or feel free to ask me if you need any help with the tool (or for anything else!). Happy editing! Pedro :  Chat  10:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment


[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Xbox Live has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ukexpat (talk) 03:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry that was an error using the vandalism tool. – ukexpat (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Emma, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thanks. NeilN talkcontribs 05:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, as above - it's Huggle as I reverted the same time as you but you seemed to have gotten the warning. Think I'll stick with Twinkle. --NeilN talkcontribs 05:09, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why did you delete my contributions to the AK-47 page?

I was merely posting about the legalities of the rifle in the US and Canada.

As an owner of AK type rifles and as a gun rights advocate, I would know what I was talking about.

It was in NO WAY vandalism.

Thanks for listening. 72.73.43.199 (talk) 06:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)g3shooter

  • Replied on your talk page, Metagraph comment

[edit] Huggle is fast, heh?

Hi, it seems that this revert was just a little too quick… »:-/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skarebo (talkcontribs) 06:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

  • “I guess thats what happens when..” I think, that's what happens when some pages tend to attract lots of vandals… :-) Skarebo (talk) 07:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
  • another thing… probably it would be nice to un-bite this fella. Skarebo (talk) 07:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Revert to my contribution

Could you please explain to me how the edit on Destroy All Humans! Path of the Furon was unconstructive? I was simply adding some more text that would give more information and help the part I was editing to make sense. I never meant for anything to become out of place, or add any speculation or such. --SWJS: The All Knowing Destroy All Humans! Nerd(Cortex Scan) 08:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)