User talk:Martintg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Martintg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! User:Advocatus diaboli
 Archives |
| 1 |
Contents |
[edit] Express Your opinion, please
- Red army crimes in Estonia - attacked article, voting for deleting debate is going on page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red_army_crimes_in_Estonia
- Red Army crimes
—Preceding unsigned comment added by ttturbo (talk • contribs)
[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Polish Foreign Ministry
Template:Polish Foreign Ministry has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suvalkai Region
Thanks for taking interest in this discussion, do note my reply. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 14:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Bronze_Soldier_of_Tallinn#Another_edit_war
Hi, Martin. I would consider protection except that I both lack the appropriate button and think that the protection of Bronze Night has already demonstrated a poor result from this. If it keeps going I may ask for the page to be protected; but for now I wait with amused anticipation - Peripitus (Talk) 21:29, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Digwuren
Do you know that Digwuren case is debated again by Arbcomm [1]? Biophys (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Clairifcation for Category:Foreign volunteer units of Nazi Germany
Hi Martin, the problem is that there are afew (if not quite afew) notable examples where the units included in this category are quite controversial topics where different views are expressed, eg some were not (ostensibly) subscribers to the Nazi ideology, some through anti-bolshevism, some through nationalistic ideologies. I felt the clarification is more to the fact that the participation was not to the Nazi ideology. I agree that other categories exist (eg, Category:Foreign volunteer units of the Wehrmacht etc) and frankly I am not happy myself. But inclusion of a particular category will be seen by many as assigning or confirming a particular view, hence I felt it might be more appropriate to leave the clarification, as each individual category may stand in isolation. rueben_lys (talk · contribs) 06:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
