User talk:Marathi mulgaa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page. Be my guest, make yourself comfortable and pen me a few lines....
[edit] Thanks
for doing this. I had just spent time searching for all of the different difs and putting together some text and by the time I got there you beat me to it. My thoughts exactly!
I recall seeing your postings on 4d-don's page? I think you were on the Sahaj Marg page before I came on? (I watched Wiki from afar for a long time and finally took the plunge June 07 but I don't recall you while I was active on it?) Welcome back!
Do you know of any doctoral dissertations on Sahaj Marg? I've searched for them and found only one that mentioned it peripherally -- it listed it as an example of a meditation group. I think it was at a Texas university. (This was way back before the AFDs when we were trying to find secondary sources.)
Anyways, looking forward to interacting with you. Renee (talk) 00:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Cult free world/Proposed Sahaj Marg India
You requested speedy deletion of this page as a re-creation of a previously deleted page. Can you point out the AfD where this content was previously deleted? Thanks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] thanks for your note
...and yes, I agree 1000 percent with you. This is very frustrating. By the way, you didn't sign your comment so I added the unsigned comment template from here. Helps me keep track of who writes what on my page. Renee (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- p.s. I just looked at your contribs and it looks like you're a new user (I noticed you got the welcome thing below from Pharaoh) yet you have old posts on 4d-don's page and when I click on your contribs on his history page it shows a different list here. Do you know what's going on? Renee (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed Deletion
You may wish to weigh in on the proposed deletion of this page. Renee (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sock Case
Dear Marathi_Mulaga, Thanks for supporting the case I launched and your comment at [1]. I have a request though - with all sincerity, the case I have launched against CFW and Shashwat is against their actions and not themselves. So please, if we all can refrain from language and attitude of personal attack, it will be best for all. Duty2love (talk) 04:00, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your input
Dear Marathi Mulaga, Here is an RfC on CFW's proposed page where you have contributed before, your input will be helpful. Duty2love (talk) 07:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] useful
Dear Marathi, I found this discussion useful and posted it on CFW's proposed article talk page. Thanks, Renee (talk) 13:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] will look for it
Dear Marathi - I'm currently traveling but will look for it Wed. morning when I'm home. By the way, just read your user page and learned all about you. Warrior huh? Interesting userpage! Thanks for hanging around the Sahaj Marg page. Renee (talk) 03:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Aircraft of the Indian navy
Already the link exists in the IN article. So if you add such links there will be multiple links in the page. It need to be removed.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Your contribution to the article is excellent. Well done.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 07:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Answer to your question
Hi Marathi, In answer to your question here, I retrieved the entire article and yes, the quotation is extracted accurately. (It's a footnote.) I now have it as a pdf file and would be happy to email it to you. I tried to email via the link here, but it doesn't allow attachments. If you send me an email I'll respond with the attachment to your regular email. Renee (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Indian aircraft
In answer to your question the way to remove the article from the "X needs attention" categories is to change the paramemters of the B-class list within the MILHIST template. I went ahead and did this for you, so it should be off the list now. Good work, BTW. Keep it up. TomStar81 (Talk) 09:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
What about an article on Indian Naval aviation. It can have all information about past,present and future of Indian Naval aviation (This can include information on AC's aircrafts, the wars etc etc. What is your opinion. I will surely add my part but not now. I will be busy for some days.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 12:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, the name of the article can be changed to Indian naval aviation. Also all the links need to be changed automatically. Administrator help can be requested in this matter.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Need Help - How to change the title of an article
Ping! --ROGER DAVIES talk 04:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tejas image
Thanks for the note but each fair use image still needs a fair use rationale for each page that it is used on. Fair use images are not normally used outside of the subject article which would be HAL Tejas but I have tagged the image as a candidate for speedy deletion which can be stopped if a fair use rationale is written for every use and that the rationale meets the criteria. MilborneOne (talk) 11:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry should have explained you need to add this Template:Non-free use rationale to the image page for each article you want to use the image in. Some more instructions in Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline might help. Let me know if you need any help. MilborneOne (talk) 16:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have created a fair-use rationale for the image for it to be used in the HAL Tejas article, dont think the guidance allows it to be used in Indian Naval Air Arm where it is not the subject and just used for decoration. MilborneOne (talk) 12:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sahaj Marg
I've been following the discussions on the Sahaj Marg page due to an interest in Cult Free World on another article. I thought you might find this useful.
http://books.google.com/books?id=0YYYAAAAIAAJ&q=Sahaj+Marg&dq=Sahaj+Marg&lr=&pgis=1
--PTR (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. I found it using books.google.com from the Google advanced search page. There's also a scholar.google.com and http://news.google.com/archivesearch --PTR (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Marathi, Thanks for moving the references around in the Sahaj Marg page. I was about to do the same. It looks great... Embhee (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Aircraft of the Indian Navy
Are you sure you don't want to move this to something like Indian Naval Air Arm or whatever the formal title of the force is? It would acknowledge your work on the page on the Air Arm itself and its people and history, not just its aircraft. Just a suggestion. Best regards from Down Under. Buckshot06(prof) 09:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your Welcome
I'll do my best. I do hope I am being equitable, as I am not an expert in this subject -- actually, I know zero about this subject! On the plus side, the other editors involved have been very cordial and easy to understand. The worst is when there is a topic I know nothing about, and both sides tend to make very long confusing posts that I don't understand! ha ha ha... --Jaysweet (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Images
There are many images of Surya Kiran and Dhruv in Flickr which satisfy the Wiki commons rule. Can you search it and load it when time permits. Also add the category so that multiple additions are avoided.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 03:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Try this [2] and this [3]. The Sukhoi's are already there in Wikipedia. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 03:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it is worth adding images of aircraft with foreign nations, even though we may be operating those. Ex.Hawk. It is not even inducted into the navy and the image did not suit the place. But the Mig-29 image is a good addition, since it did not come with any country sign. Regarding the image addition, I think it is necessary to have the image close to the same content. Certain images are being removed to make it worth look good.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
I understood what you said. The screen makes a lot of different for viewing. There was similar problem for me when you made changes and added new images. I will make certain changes to make sure that these things are solved. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Vikrant picture must not be in the gallery because its indigenous development and is a new ship than the older Gorshkov. It's a big problem that there are multiple views for various viewers and we have to consider this while adding images into an article.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
The Vikramaditya is till not in Indian hands, whereas the IAC is already under construction at Cochin shipyard. The IAC and Gorshkov will be joining the IN in the year 2012. We expect the Vikram to come first but who knows. Regarding the Images, preference must always be given to Indigenous products over imported ones since it shows the technological maturity of the nation.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:55, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
My opinion is that the Gorshkov image is not even that of the Indian Navy. It was the image while being in the Russian Navy. So that image did not suit there. If you are so particular about the Gorshkov image, try to get an image of the Gorshkov, i mean Vikramaditya (like a image of its model) by getting permission from the copyright holder. I don't understand why you want to replace it. I don't have a problem for you accusing me for being nationalistic or .... But from a point of visual appeal I would suggest the IAC. The IAC image is much more realistic and appropriate for the article. It was done after much thought. Now you are free to do what you want.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 07:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
The main point I made regarding the Indigenous equipment is because, it is something that is made in India and very much related to the technological prowess of the nation. How many nations have the capability to build aircraft carriers. The articles must look realistic and the reader must be able to understand the advances and capabilities of the Indian Navy. We must also think from a readers point of view, and make sure that a person reading the article understands the reality as it is. Otherwise i feel that it is spreading only half the truth and the other half is hidden from the reader not giving him the realistic picture. This applies to all the articles.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 07:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
"This is a wikipedia article, not a patriotic essay on the technological capabilities of Indians. It cannot sacrifice quality of the article to make a nationalistic point."
What you mean by the above points. Are you trying to say that the IAC is not Indian and adding it in the article is to make something of a patriotic thing. If you thing from that perspective, it may have it as well. But you cannot or anyone cannot say that it cannot be there just because it is associated with the technological capabilities of Indians. What is wrong with the technological capabilities of Indians. Are you feeling ashamed of the IAC and feeling that having IAC will create a situation in which others will accuse you of being patriotic and it is not good to be patriotic. I don't agree with your points. You cannot deny the space for the IAC for the reason that it is build by Indians.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 07:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
You misunderstood me. It's not my intention to see whether you are patriotic or not, since it makes no difference in Wiki articles, where the only criteria is about correctness of the article. We can have a Gorshkov image as well but not the one posted. The one that will be inducted in the IN will be far different from the one in the image. The missiles will go and there will be a skyjump ramp. Instead of VTOL aircrafts the ship will be operating Mig-29s. So there is a big difference between the two. If a image of the Vikramaditya model is available, it can be put in that place. Regarding the IAC image it is the only image on the net of the ship. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
