User talk:Mabelina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Speedy deletion of Hurst Hall 2 Speedy deletion of Hurst Hall 3 Your various contributions to Cheshire-related articles (e.g., Culcheth and Glazebury, and others) 4 Speedy deletion of Arms of His Grace Archbishop Lawrence Booth.jpg 5 Speedy deletion of Archbishop Booth's arms.jpg

[edit] Speedy deletion of Hurst Hall

A tag has been placed on Hurst Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 04:49, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Hurst Hall

A tag has been placed on Hurst Hall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your various contributions to Cheshire-related articles (e.g., Culcheth and Glazebury, and others)

hello, and welcome to wikipedia. I see you have added quite a bit of information to some Cheshire-related articles (using "Cheshire" in its ceremonial-county role). Thank you for them! I wonder if you would consider improving your contributions even more? To do that, it would be helpful if you were able to read through WP:UKCITIES and use that you guide you in structuring the articles. Similarly, it would also help immensely if you could give more detailed references to the sources you have used to write the information. I've already edited some of your contributions to make the referencing conform more to the way wikipedia likes them done, but it would be really good if you could try to make your contributions more like that to begin with. I've made some of the changes for you, but there will be others I have missed, or which I cannot complete because you have given only general pointers to a document (so including page numbers will help a lot.) I know it may be a lot to take in in a short time, but trying to master it now will, I am sure, help make the editing experience for you much more enjoyable in the long term. Thanks.  DDStretch  (talk) 09:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello again. I've noticed you've removed some information from the references in High Legh. It was not a good idea to do that, as the information is required and conforms to policy over what should be included in references to websites. You can find out about this in WP:V, and [[WP:CITE[[, as well as WP:References. I hope you can avoid doing this in future, and so help make your contributions better than they are at the moment. Regards.  DDStretch  (talk) 09:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Arms of His Grace Archbishop Lawrence Booth.jpg

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Oore (talk) 00:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Archbishop Booth's arms.jpg

A tag has been placed on Archbishop Booth's arms.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

• Archbishop Booth's arms.jpg was in what we call the article namespace and was thus nonsense. Image:Archbishop Booth's arms.jpg is at least in the right namespace. What you must do is: a) give the source of the iamge and b) find out what the appropriate licence tag is and apply it. Regarding these edits, please: always log in before editing, use the preview button more and provide edit summaries. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your e-mail. But would it not have been better to deal with my suggestions above? "This image was computer-generated so there is no way there could be a copyright issue". I do not see the logic - computer-generated images are subject to copyright same as any other images. -- — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 05:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I had intended to make you do the hunting, but since I have found it, I will point you to Wikipedia:Copyright on emblems. Incidentally, the image should be re-uploaded as a PNG or SVG rather than a JPG and a transparent background would probably be better, see this for example. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)