Talk:Liberty Meadows

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (general): Comic strips work group

Anyone heard of this, or done the Google testing? Is it Copy-vio? It sounds like the author's own promotional web page; should it be VfD'd or scrubbed with a stiff encyclopedic brush?
--Jerzy·t 23:10, 2005 August 2 (UTC)

I don't really see where this seems like a promotional web page to you and the part of this article I wrote (most of the lead section) is no Copy-vio. What exactly do you find unencyclopedic about it? --Fritz S. 09:11, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

I think i was mostly concerned about a fannish tone, but i'm more than happy to defer to those willing to do more work on it than i am. [smile]

--Jerzy·t 06:53, 2005 August 4 (UTC)

It looks thoroughly encyclopedic to me, and checks out as notable via Google: 90,900 hits for "Frank Cho", 161,000 for "Liberty Meadows". Tearlach 12:27, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Censorship?

Some further information on why the strip was censored, and what the problem was with issue #27, would be welcome. 207.31.229.4 20:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

As I understand it the censorship was only of the newspaper strips. The move from self-published to Image for the comic book was unrelated. (but I do not have any sources at hand fro this.) —MJBurrage • TALK • 22:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)