User talk:L.Wadsworth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution by uploading the image :Image:M.S Explorer.jpg. Your test worked, and the image that you uploaded has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. the copyright/license information was not included. Ryan Delaney talk 05:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

  • There's no need to get upset and resort to name-calling. I tagged it for deletion because the image is copyright. You failed to source where you got it from, who took the image, and you didn't include a fair-use rationale on why it should have been uploaded. Also, most images like this are to be placed in Wikimedia Commons. - Cheers, Vicer Userpage | Talk 06:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I have included a link in my previous message, please refer to that and please stop deleting my entry in Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. You have the chance to upload it again afterwards with the fair-use rationale. - Cheers, Vicer Userpage | Talk 06:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:M.S. Explorer Escape.jpg. The copy called Image:M.S. Explorer Escape.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 08:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:M.S Explorer.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:M.S Explorer.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KTC (talk) 10:26, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Please when correcting, list the actual copyright holder / source. Thanks. KTC (talk) 11:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Please do not adjust the Australia page again in relation to John Howard/Kevin Rudd until there is a declaration --VS talk 10:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:M.S. Explorer Escape new.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:M.S. Explorer Escape new.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KTC (talk) 10:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg

Please note I've changed the licensing/source of Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg as the image is © AFP/Fuerza Aerea De Chile which means you can't realise it under GFDL as you're not the copyright holder. Please do not upload copyrighted images that you don't have permission for and then tag it as under GFDL. Thanks. KTC (talk) 10:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Australia

Hi. I noticed you called other people "wan^$#%" in your edit summary to Australia. Please do not be uncivil in future. Additionally, I think you might be mistaken as to what "incumbent" means; it does not mean "incoming". - Mark 12:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Incumbent means the current office holder, until KR is sworn in by the GG he isnt the incumbent. Also WP:3RR I notice you have made 6 reverts to KR so far please stop. Gnangarra 12:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
clarify I was referring to your reverts on the Australia article to "Kevin Rudd (incumbent)" 6 times not the KR article. Gnangarra 13:09, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. - Mark 12:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPA

This comment looks to me like an WP:NPA, I think you should exercise some restraint you appear to be getting to emotional, its at times like these that good editors get blocks. Gnangarra 13:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:M.S. Explorer Escape2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MS Explorer Image

no one else had a problem with my explorer pic --L. Wadsworth

Actually, if you take a look at the talk page, a few well-established editors did explain rationale behind the image replacement. Additionally, if you look at the history of the article, the person who changed the image was another well-established editor with knowledge of the fair use issues here. Fair use policy on Wikipedia is extremely tricky, and you would be well-advised to stay away from the matter until you've been around for long enough to have a partial understanding of it (it is so complex that no one can understand the situation entirely). --Constantine (talk) 13:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I apologize if my tone seemed to you in any way insulting, as I only intended to warn you of the considerable difficulties involved with such matters here. I will readily admit that my knowledge of the Fair use policy here is of a most rudimentary nature, and that I would be wary of becoming involved in the area myself. Thus my views on the acceptability of the Explorer picture are based nearly entirely on the judgement of those far more versed in such matters. However, as your new placement of the image does make sense, and would seem to present a reasonable argument for fair use in the context of that section until a Free image can be procured, I won't revert the addition, especially as I personally am inclined to think the image should be included. --Constantine (talk) 13:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh, as another note: I don't consider myself a well-established editor. The editors objecting to this were quite experienced. --Constantine (talk) 14:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Belated welcome

I noticed that it appears nobody has ever given you the standard Wikipedia welcome message, so here it is:

Welcome!

Hello, L.Wadsworth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

-- I hope that helps explain a few things to you and helps you settle in. :) - Mark 14:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your images

I put a deletion tag on your two M.S. Explorer images. As I mentioned on the talk page for the ship, AP photos have a much more stringent requirement for fair use justification, and usually are only acceptable if the photo itself is the subject of the article. Thanks. kmccoy (talk) 07:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

You changed the source of one photo from AP to Reuters, yet the URL says it's AP. I don't know how that works, but it doesn't matter. Photos from news/photo agencies are only fair use if the photo itself is the subject of the article. If you can determine that photos created by the Chilean military are in the public domain, then change the images to reflect that, otherwise I will be deleting these photos as copyright violations. Thanks. kmccoy (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Jay2k

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt(t)(c)I'm on editor review! 11:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

Sure, I'll adopt you. Just change the current userbox on your userpage from {{adoptoffer}} to {{adoptee|Cremepuff222}} and we'll get started. *Cremepuff222* 23:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Yep, feel free to ask me questions. And for your information, I'm likely to reply to your questions on my talk page rather than yours. *Cremepuff222* 22:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another Australian on the block...

Welcome! It's nice to see another Wikipedian from Queensland. I'm from Brisbane and I'm open to any questions you might have. Feel free to contact me at any time. Happy editing! — E talkBAG 00:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Hervey Bay

Since you didn't leave an edit summary, would you care to share with me your reason for undoing my edit. The category Category:Towns in Queensland is clearly inappropriate as Hervey Bay is a member of Category:Cities in Queensland and "qld" is the correct format to use in the infobox per {{Infobox Australian Place}}. -- Mattinbgn\talk 05:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

No, no hard feelings. I was just a little confused as the edit was not a controversial one. I see you have started work on improving the article. Good luck with that and if you ever need a hand please let me know. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 10:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] date

No matter what you read elsewhere, William Shakespeare's birth date is (as our article makes clear) unknown. - Nunh-huh 07:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, one can provide references to many wrong answers. We try to provide the right ones. - Nunh-huh 07:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
You've now been reverted by two different editors, and you have reverted to your preferred version 3 times. Please be on notice that Wikipedia's three revert rule means that no editor should perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A fourth revert would put you in violation of this rule. The usual penalty for violation is being blocked from editing for 24 hours.
If you remain convinced of your belief that the article should specify a birth date for Shakespeare, you should feel free to try building a consensus for that change on the talk page of the article. If you don't do so, I am quite confident that your proposed change will continue to be reverted. - Nunh-huh 08:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to William Shakespeare

Hi. I reverted your change to the info box on this page, so that it continues to match the information in the text. Best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:21, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your note on my talk page. It is true that anyone can edit, and edits that add to the encyclopedia are very welcome, but there a few rules. Here's one you might care to have a look at: follow the link here. --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC).

[edit] List of cities in Australia by population

As indicated by heading of the section of the article that you edited, the population figures used in the article are the populations of Capital city Statistical Divisions and Statistical Districts. For the Hervey Bay Statistical District, this figure is 48,157 as you can see by looking here. This is the same link that is next to Hervey Bay in the article. The population figure used in the Hervey Bay, Queensland article doesn't have to be the same as the figure used in List of cities in Australia by population.

Incidentally, I had a look at the figure that you used when you edited a few days ago and found that it was actually the the population figure for the Hervey Bay City Council Local Government Area (LGA).[1] The population figure for the Hervey Bay, Queensland article is the population for the town, which is not the same as the LGA. At the reference that you provided[2], if you add the figures under Population in Selected Locations (ABS, 2006) you'll see that they add up to a different figure to that presented as the Hervey Bay Population. This is not an error. If you follow the links provided on the page you can check the figures for each locality. These are the figures that the council uses.

Although I've used the figure that you get when you add up the figures under Population in Selected Locations (ABS, 2006) as the population for Hervey Bay in the Hervey Bay, Queensland article, this is probably not correct as the article identifies a number of towns that are "outside the Hervey Bay area but within the city council boundaries". If you remove these, as probably should happen, the population is only 43,652.

Please also note that the ABS is not wrong. The figures used are the result of actual counts, are checked and rechecked and considered authoritive.

I have reverted the article back to the correct figure. Please do not change it again. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the links that you provided, one is for the 4655 postcode area while the other is for the Hervey Bay Statistical District. If you look at the maps of the postcode area and Statistical District you'll see that in addition to the 4655 postcode area the Statistical District also includes part of the 4659 postcode area. That's the simple reason for the difference.

As for the areas outside the Harvey Bay area, yes they should be covered in the Hervey Bay City Council article but as I've already explained, the Hervey Bay, Queensland article is not the same as Hervey Bay City Council. The council's own figures show that. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Australia

The image of a Hervey Bay beach that you added to this article, while appropriate for the Hervey Bay, Queensland article is not appropriate for the Australia article. Hervey Bay is not mentioned in the article and the image adds nothing. The image was deleted on the last two occasions taht you added it and I have deleted it again. if you wish to add this image you should discuss it on the talk page first and gain consensus for it to be added or add valid text, with appropriate citations, that makes use of the image. --AussieLegend (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Edit history is not consensus. It's up to the person wishing to add something to justify inclusion, not the other way round. Now that two editors have objected to the image you have to justify its inclusion. --AussieLegend (talk) 10:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Australia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have been warned before on the issue of 3rr. Please do not continue to put up the image regarding Hervey Bay on this article until you can show exactly where, you previously discussed this issue and found that fastest growing city and gateway to fraser i have had this problem before and everyone agreed to move pic to current location --VS talk 10:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hervey Bay Image on Australia

  • Please show me/us exactly where you have had the discussion on this image so that I can review my concern. I will also post this question to the other editor that has removed the picture. We will await your return and until then please do not put the image back up. Cheers!--VS talk 10:36, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Once again - please look at my comments above and answer the question fairly. If you make another edit regarding this image I will report you to 3rr. I suggest with respect that you contact your adopter User:Cremepuff222 and ask for further advice before you find yourself blocked for your disruptive reverts.--VS talk 10:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
No one is trying to "Bully" you - we are asking you a legitimate question. You have answered to say that there was a discussion in Oct-Nov last year. I have checked through the edit history of Australia and there is NO discussion regarding the Hervey Bay image at all. Now, quite frankly, I note that you want to be an admin one day - and no doubt you could be BUT first can you start to become part of the team? Others - including myself will be very willing to help - but not if you keep reverting and adding hyperbolic and ad hoc content as you think might fit.--VS talk 10:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of cities in Australia by population. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please note that the rule applies per editor. The use of multiple accounts is not a legitimate way to avoid this limit, and reverts by multiple accounts are counted as reverts made by one editor. The rule otherwise applies to all editors individually. By reverting as User:220.240.147.146 you have broken the three-revert rule --AussieLegend (talk) 12:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Report to 3rr

As a courtesy I am writing to inform you that I have reported your actions at 3rr breach by User:L.Wadsworth. You have been requested to cease your edits relating to Hervey Bay, Queensland by a number of editors and your continued adjustments - now appearing whilst you are not signed on should cease immediately.--VS talk 12:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 HOURS in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. nat.utoronto 19:44, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Unfair and was bullied no one gave a reason for removing my work just removed it not fair at all."

Decline reason: "I can see several lengthy explanations above and on the article's talk page. I can also see five or so warnings over 3RR. Additionally, the IP identified in your first unblock request appears to have continued the revert war. I can see no reason to unblock. Kuru talk 01:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

All warnings appear to have been issued after last edit. User did not revert again. Please read over WP:3RR and ensure your edits are backed by reliable sources, otherwise, though it may be accurate, it's considered original research.

Request handled by: Lara❤Love 01:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Lara missed a lingering autoblock, when releasing the original block; try again, see if you can edit now? – Luna Santin (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Brisbane meetup

Riverside Precinct Brisbane Meetup
Next: In Discussion
Last: February 10, 2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Delivered on behalf of Dihydrogen Monoxide. Sorry you got this later than some other people - took the lazy botop 2 days to run :) Giggabot (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Editor Review

I have reviewed you at Wikipedia:Editor review/L.Wadsworth. Sorry it took so long and that I wasn't able to give a more extensive review, there are very few editors willing to work on that backlog. Useight (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Notice of Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting

Dear Wikimedian,

I am writing to you as your named is listed at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia under "People interested in helping to create a local chapter". Wikimedia Australia's draft rules have been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation, and we now intend to incorporate in the state of Victoria. You are hereby informed of the intention to hold a Wikimedia Australia meeting on 20th April 2008 with the intention to

(a) authorize a person who has attained the age of 18 years and who is resident in the State to incorporate Wikimedia Australia under the Victorian Associations Incorporation Act 1981; [that is, elect a Public Officer] (b) approve a proposed statement of purposes of Wikimedia Australia; and (c) approve the proposed rules of Wikimedia Australia.

A majority of members must vote to pass the motion to incorporate as an association, for it to meet the requirements of the Act.

The proposed rules, and proposed statement of purpose, can be found here:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Draft_Rules_for_Wikimedia_Australia_Inc

Details of the incorporation meeting, including local meetings (to be joined up by teleconferencing, with any luck) and the agenda, can be found here:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Incorporation


In particular, you are invited to attend the Melbourne meeting:

I also encourage you to take part in discussion on the mailing list: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/Wikimediaau-l

If you are unable to attend, you can vote by proxy. Please copy the proxy form at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Australia/Proxy_form and send it to me in an email. (It is better to appoint a generic member, e.g. "Meeting Chair" or "Acting Secretary", both of whom will be of Melbourne, rather than a specific member, but the choice is yours.)

If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ask.

Yours sincerely, Brianna Laugher Provisional Secretary, Wikimedia Australia

special:emailuser/pfctdayelise skype/irc/wikipedia/meta/commons: pfctdayelise

[edit] Brisbane meetup invitation

Riverside Precinct Brisbane Meetup
Next: In Discussion
Last: February 10, 2008
This box: view • talk • edit

Hey there, you're invited to the second Brisbane Meetup. Please see the page at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/2 for more details. Hope to see you there!

Automated message delivered by Giggabot (stop!) to Wikipedians in Queensland and known Brisbaneites, at 03:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC).