User talk:Kcordina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I'm going to be away from wikipedia for a while, and when I return it will only be for intermittent editing at a low level. I certainly won't be able to contribute to a significant degree, nor act on any requests quickly.

Messages here will be read at some point, but don't expect a quick reply.


Hi, are you still online?


Kimmie Weeks

Hi,

I'm not sure you're still checking this. You recently deleted an article on Kimmie Weeks. Why was this? I am about to repost, but don't want to spend time doing it if it will be deleted again.

Contents

[edit] Invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy

Hi there! I've noticed that you've edited articles pertaining to the Eastern Orthodox Church. I wanted to extend an invitation to you to join the WikiProject dedicated to organizing and improving articles on the subject, which can be found at: WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. This WikiProject was begun because a need was perceived to raise the level of quality of articles on Wikipedia which deal with the Eastern Orthodox Church.

You can find information on the project page about the WikiProject, as well as how to join and how to indicate that you are a member of the project. Additionally, you may be interested in helping out with our collaboration of the month. I hope you'll consider joining and thank you for your contributions thus far! —A.S. Damick talk contribs 12:42, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Research Survey Request

Hello, I am a member of a research group at Palo Alto Research Center (formerly known as Xerox PARC) studying how conflicts occur and resolve on Wikipedia. Due to your experience in conflict resolution on Wikipedia (e.g., as a member of the Mediation Cabal) we’re extremely interested in your insights on this topic. We have a survey at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=400792384029 which we are inviting a few selected Wikipedians to participate in, and we would be extremely appreciative if you would take the time to complete it. As a token of our gratitude, we would like to present you with a PARC research star upon completion. Thank you for your time.

Parc wiki researcher 00:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
PARC User Interface Research Group

[edit] European patent Law / Euroean Patent Convention

These two articles had grown largely redundant, so I combined most of the work we did on European patent law into European patent convention and left behind a link. Could you double check that it's still right? I did not intentionally remove anything - but as an American lawyer, I may not have recognized the importance of something that I thought was two redundant statements of the same thing.

Thanks User:Boundlessly

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Eddie Van Halen rocking.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eddie Van Halen rocking.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Angr 15:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article for deletion

Hi, an article you contributed to (Celtic Alliance of America) is being considered for deletion. Please feel free to have your say on why you feel the article should stay or go. Best, QuartierLatin1968 El bien mas preciado es la libertad 19:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] YouTube links

I know that you are a student of law/lawyer. Your comments would be appreciated here. – Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#YouTube link deletion. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick 09:58, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bay Chamber concerts

2/23/07 - Re: 12:41, 25 January 2007 Kcordina (Talk | contribs) deleted "Bay Chamber Concerts" (Self-admitted copyvio) I created the page, and don't know why it was deleted. Self-admitted copyright violation? The photo that was on the page, and the text from the entry was supplied by their creator, me. How could that be a violation of copyright? I do know that more work was needed to link to and from. Could you please put the page back, so I can work on that issue? Chance Farago - hephestes at yahoo.

In the edit for the page creation it says 'mostly taken from bay chamber orchestra page' - that web site is not labelled as public-domain or as licensed under the GFDL, and is therefore presumed to be copyrighted to someone. In order for material to be used from other sites it needs to licensed under the GFDL, or permission explicitly granted to use the material. Permission can be granted by sending an email to permissions(at)wikimedia.org from an address associated with the website, who will provide a reference number that can be used to verify the permission. In the meantime, if you leave a post here from a registered username (not an IP address as per your last edit) I shall assume good faith, and reinstate the page. Kcordina Talk 16:35, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lydden.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Lydden.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Lydden.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Image description page for image on the Commons


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Lydden.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Hi, I just wanted to ask you a question about CAT:NC. I would like to help out with the backlog there rather than staying at CAT:CSD and the like however I am unsure of the criteria that must be met before deleting images there. Is it after 10 days of not edits/being tagged etc?. When using Bad Old Ones tool when is it OK to use the reasons there?. Thanks! --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 18:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Template:CanElec1 end

A tag has been placed on Template:CanElec1 end requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Survivors Fund

I was just wondering whether it would be possible to get any feedback on why the entry for Survivors Fund (SURF) was deleted? Any guidance that you could offer would be gratefully received, and whether it would be worthwhile recreating the page? If so, what we would then need to do differently to ensure that it is acceptable?

Any help gratefully received.

Kind regards,

David www.survivors-fund.org