User talk:KC109/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents 1 School of St. Mary (Lake Forest, Illinois) 2 License tagging for Image:SOSM-IL.jpg 3 Image copyright problem with Image:Roevwade.gif 4 How to get vandals blocked 5 Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism! 6 WP:AIV 7 RE:Adoption 8 User:F9T/WikiCup 9 Your recent edits 10 Rollback 11 Autograph book 12 East Lake 13 RFA 14 peer review 15 Thankyou! 16 Image copyright problem with Image:Bernese.jpg 17 Removal of comment 18 Userpage vandalism 19 Cassie Bernall 20 Adoption 21 V-day 22 RfA Coaching 23 Nousernamesleft 24 I'm a freak who needs a life 25 Please stop 26 Adoption 27 RFA 28 A sincere question 29 Re:Point taken 30 Re:February 2008 31 Adoption! 32 Thanks for the barnstar! 33 SBS FAC... 34 Roman Catholic Church 35 4im warnings 36 RE: 37 Polish Conspiracy 38 Huggle 39 Glad you liked it 40 Thank you for the compliment on my username 41 Roman Catholic Church 42 Secret page 43 The Constant or The Economist? 44 Vandalism Template 45 WikiCup 46 WikiProject Council roll call 47 Awards Center Newsletter 48 Award Center Newsletter, Edition 1 49 RE: 50 RE: Sig 51 Thanks for supporting 52 MLK 53 Signature 54 Thanks 55 Help With Your Page 56 Award Center Newsletter

School of St. Mary (Lake Forest, Illinois)

You should be aware that the article was deleted before as non-notable. AnteaterZot (talk) 23:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but the school is recognized as one of the top primary schools in the nation.KC109 22:25, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

What I meant was; be sure to have reliable, third party sources in your article that show that the school is notable. The fact that it was deleted before means that people will take a dim view of a new article without citations. AnteaterZot (talk) 22:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I will put those in once done; I am the leading member of the school special team working to revamp the whole thing.KC109 22:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Cool. AnteaterZot (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Did you put that information in there?

License tagging for Image:SOSM-IL.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SOSM-IL.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Roevwade.gif

Thank you for uploading Image:Roevwade.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

How to get vandals blocked

1. Go to WP:AIV
2. Scroll to the bottom of the page
3. Click [edit] where it says User-reported
4. Follow the instructions in the edit source and save the edit
5. An admin should deal with the complaint shortly

Thanks. Ref ^(chew)(do) 01:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I happened to notice that you posted and self-reverted on the subject at one of my watched admins talk pages (watched to protect from vandals, which is appropriate). Rather than perhaps stay in the dark about the process, I thought you would like to become an active vandal-fighter, like I am. I have always found that, if you are absolutely spot-on with the number of warnings you have given to a vandal (generally 4, but less in the case of repeat-after-a-block perpetrators or serial page-blankers), admins deal very quickly with the serious cases. Thanks and good luck. Ref ^(chew)(do) 23:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

 ;)  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 00:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!

Hello, KC109/Archive 3, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help
contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! --Thw1309 (talk) 12:59, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV

I have removed the report you made to WP:AIV concerning vandalism on Gravesend Grammar School. The user you are referring to, while making edits that tend to be counter to WP:MOS are not vandalism per se. Well meaning but incorrect edits should be dealt with through discussion rather than vandalism reports. Trusilver 02:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:Adoption

Yes I am, and of course! There is no requirements for adoption, anyone can request to be adopted, and I am willing. Tiptoety ^talk 19:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Great, where are you wanting to start? You can start off quick and move right into creating articles, we can take it a bit slower by going over policies, or you can work on doing some newpage and recent change patrolling (ridding wikipedia of vandals). I am not sure what you are interested in doing here. Tiptoety ^talk 20:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, i notice that you have already been doing a little of that on your own, do you currently use any tools (automated systems) to do your vandal fighting? Tiptoety ^talk 20:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay, some tools only work with certain web browsers, do you use internet explorer, or firefox? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiptoety (talk • contribs) 20:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure can. Tiptoety ^talk 20:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I am available for a short period of time. As i was saying, there are not too many good vandal fighting programs that can be used with internet explorer, so you will just have to revert them manually by using the Undo button. Tiptoety ^talk 02:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you read up on the blocking policy and the banning policy, then tell me what the difference between the two is, then we can actively get to some vandal fighting! Tiptoety ^talk 03:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

User:F9T/WikiCup

Hi, just to inform you, you're going to have to change your country as it has already been taken. Thanks.  Sunderland06  20:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Thanks for rolling back vandalism here. --Uncle Ed (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Autograph book

Thank you for singing my Autograph book. Really appreciate it. Cheers, LAX 20:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

East Lake

Hi KC, the article was proposed for deletion, and no one opposed the "prod" for the allotted time, so it was deleted according to the policy I just linked you to. I'd be happy to undelete it if you'd like to work on it, but only on a couple conditions: first, you need to provide references to reliable sources, per the very fundamental verifiability policy. It shouldn't be hard to do. Just link to them on my talk page or something, then I can give you the article and you can work on it in your userspace (that is, any page beginning with User:KC109/... such as User:KC109/Sandbox). The other condition is that you read WP:SCHOOL and try to figure out if this school meets the proposed guideline. See, Wikipedia has requirements about how notable a subject has to be before it can be included, and the general feeling is that elementary schools aren't notable unless there's something special about them. Admittedly, it's just a proposed guideline, not a real one, but it should give you an idea of what you're looking for in terms of notability. The real guidelines would be WP:N or maybe WP:ORG. But really what it comes down to is the sources. If you can provide those, the article will most likely be kept. But you should understand that every single fact in the article needs to be attributable to a reliable source; no original ideas (those that haven't been published before) are allowed in articles. Don't hesitate to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions or need anything, I'm always glad to help. Peace, delldot talk 05:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

RFA

peer review

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Wikipedia:Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2--Chrisisinchrist (talk) 05:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou!

Thanks very much for the barnstar :) --Farosdaughter (talk) 23:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bernese.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Bernese.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Removal of comment

Any reason? [1]. Thanks. Atabek (talk) 00:35, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Ehud_Lesar/Workshop#WP:POINT and reverting edits. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Userpage vandalism

Thanks, I appreciate that. Best, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 03:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Me too thanks!--Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 03:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Me three! Thanks for the help! --Calton | Talk 14:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Cassie Bernall

Responding to your post on my talk page.

Hi there! The information you are discussing is cited and, as such, I would advise against removing it. Although I am not very well-versed in the subject, I do know that removal of this information is not advisable. Might I suggest a look at Wikipedia:Controversial articles. This should provide you with some suggestions for describing both views of the incident and maintaining wikipedia's Neutral point of view. Happy editing! --omtay38 00:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi KC109, I don't recall ever interacting with you and I was quite surprised to see you add an accusatory comment to my talk page. From your edit I take it that you hold a point of view that is sympathetic to the martyrdom of Bernall. My interest in the article is purely academic, I am more interested in the investigation of the incident and the proliferation of Bernall's mother's account in Christian communities and secular media than the moral implication of her alleged statement. It was difficult to accurately represent views described by conflicting sources. Quite a few editors worked on verifying the facts and claims presented in Bernall's article and it currently reflects information supported by personal testimonies, investigative journalism, and official reports of a criminal investigation. It was both a pleasure and a challenge to collaborate with other editors in crafting an accurate and neutral article.

You may not agree with the analyses presented by some of these sources, as a reader you are welcome to dismiss portions of the article or interpret it in any way you see fit. As a Wikipedia editor, you have an obligation to abide by Wikipedia policies - specifically WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NPOV. It was inappropriate for you to blank sourced sections of this article with no prior discussion and it should come as no surprise to you that your edit was reverted. If you take issue with any part of the article, you should bring it up at Talk:Cassie Bernall. Cheers, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 15:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

• Hi, I just saw your comment on Tiptoety's page about this section. I think, you should first ask the person who placed the warning, and ask them to give reasoning for their comment, ask them to remove it. But, I've been told that you are allowed to remove warnings from your talk page. I was told that here. And, I see you are on the Counter vandalism unit. Would you agree vandalism is rather high at the moment? Steve Crossin (talk) 02:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Hello KC109, just making sure that you are still interested in going through with the adoption process? If so, please read WP:BAN and WP:BLOCK and clearly explain the difference to me, then we can get to work with some vandal fighting methods/techniques. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 18:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

V-day

Thanks for that, it is much appreciated! Hope you have a good one too! Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 05:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

RfA Coaching

Greetings, I just noticed that you had a request for Admin Coaching on the Admin Coaching Page. I have removed the request because you are not ready to become an admin. Please see the general guidelines for what most people are looking for in an admin here or my guidelines. If you don't know what your edit history looks like, please check out Kate's Tool. I encourage you to come back to the coaching page when you get closer to being qualified for adminship.Balloonman (talk) 05:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

If we continue our adoption process, then later you will be ready to request admin coaching. Tiptoety ^talk 05:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Nousernamesleft

Hi, KC109, thanks for voting in my RfA, which passed with 47 supports (I hoped for a perfect square, but two away is close enough!), 3 opposes (the first odd prime), and 0 neutrals. I'm glad the community has decided to trust me with the mop and bucket (the flamethrower isn't supported). Of course, special thanks goes to my nominators Auawise and that one guy who buried stuff (not that the thanks I give to the you isn't special!). If you ever need a hand with something, or just want to say hello, tough feel free to drop a line! Best wishes, Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 23:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC) This doesn't even vaguely resemble a mop, but I couldn't find a picture of one.

I'm a freak who needs a life

Thank you, the same to you. B110 _{communicate (that means talk)} 01:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Do you want me to count it as vandalism, or put it under the "Just say hello bar?" (I'm redecorating the page, and I'm making two sections) B110 _{communicate (that means talk)} 03:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop adding the featured template to articles that aren't featured. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

They aren't any more; look at the article history on the talk pages. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop now; if you don't know how to read and understand articlehistories on talk pages, I can guide you through it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Hey KC109, I completely understand if you are unable to continue with the adoption process at this time, and for that reason I am going to be letting you go. If you still have an interest in adoption, drop me a note and I would be happy to pick up from where we left off, if not, come back later and drop me note when you are, Cheers. Tiptoety ^talk 05:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

RFA

Thanks for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully with 40 supports, 13 opposes, and 4 neutrals. For those of you who supported my RFA, I greatly appreciate it. For those who did not, I'm also thankful for your constructive criticism. If you need some advice or have some pointers for me, you know where to reach me! A special thank you to Majorly for all his time and effort he has placed in my nomination. Once again, thank you all for your helpful comments. Now off to new admin school! Cheers, Icestorm815 • Talk 01:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

A sincere question

Why do you say I was vandalizing ClueBot's page? What I really was doing is just only leaving him a serious message which I expected a soon response as I do with this message I am leaving you. As you can see, I am a pretty unconventional vandal as I will never use profanities in my messages; I will never sink my level to that of a common Wikipedian you know. Finally, I have to say your act was considered very agressive by me as you have eaten meat recently, pretty funny you are a Catholic and it is Friday!

201.143.242.228 (talk) 02:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Point taken

I'm really glad that there is someone who is comprehensive here. You know, there was a person out there not brave enough and used his/her (I really don't want to know this) bot. Cowardice is just pityful this days. Oh, I almost forgot about the meat! I am like a detective.

Sincerely, 201.143.242.228 (talk) 02:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha! You know? You are a pretty kind person and I congratulate you because you made me since right now a good wikipedian. I will never vandalize any page anymore. But I will continue to denounce all the Islamic crimes as soon as I can.

I now have a conclusion about this: You did not eat meat. It was just my imagination.

Freedom Holmes (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I have never agreed the NPOV stuff because of its repressive nature. But as a good wikipedian I am now, I'll follow it. Just remeber the images of horror. And I will not favor any religion, just will crush Islam or any religion within a goverment. Religion must be separated from government. Or else... [2]

NOTE: This is not my website, is just a blog article that shows the horror of the crescent and star religion. This as a result of my investigations.

PS:Is just horrible Muslims are starting to infest our freedom-principled countries. Islam is not and never will be compatible with civil rights and liberties.

Freedom Holmes (talk) 02:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:February 2008

Hi, I'd just like to point out that I didn't vandalize the article, I reverted it. User:71.217.183.227, who I warned is the culprit. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 23:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Adoption!

Glad to see that you are back and ready to get started. I have sense created a more structured lesson system, which you can find here. Feel free to get started with the classes and do not hesitate to ask me questions. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 20:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Good work! I have shown you which you got correct on my user talkpage. Tiptoety ^talk 03:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar!

Hey, thanks for the barnstar and I'm glad you enjoyed the section. (you know, sometimes I wonder if anyone other than me ever reads that or not...) So again, thanks a lot!! Happy editing! Thingg^⊕⊗ 00:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

SBS FAC...

Hi there. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sunday Bloody Sunday (song) - what do you want to do? thanks--Merbabu (talk) 01:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Roman Catholic Church

Thanks for your kind vote of support for this FAC. I enjoyed going over your user page, I think you would make a great admin. I hope it all works out for you. Thanks again! NancyHeise (talk) 14:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

4im warnings

Hey there, thanks for your vandal-fighting work! The only thing that's wrong is you using {{subst:uw-vandalism4im}}, when you should start out with {{subst:uw-vandalism1}}, and work your way up to a level 4 warning. Please keep this in mind, and if you need anything, then don't hesitate to contact me. Malinaccier (talk) 22:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about it (you're in no type of trouble whatsoever!). Just start a little lower in the future. Thanks, Malinaccier Public (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

RE:

No, when a user removes a warning from their talk page that is not considered vandalism as stated here. When they remove the warning it stands as a sign that they have read the warning. As for misunderstandings, do not continue to revert the users edits who you are in a misunderstanding with (unless it is a clear cut case of vandalism). Instead talk with the user who you are having an issue with, and when all else fails ask for a third party to step in, or report the issue at WP:ANI. I am not finding the warning template that you said was placed on your talk page, did i miss something? Tiptoety ^talk 02:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Done, for issues like that it is best to discuss it on the articles talk page before you remove that much content. Tiptoety ^talk 02:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You may be interested in this page: User:Tiptoety/Adoption/KC109. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 02:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Great! I have made the addition. Tiptoety ^talk 02:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Polish Conspiracy

Oh, so are you doing the Deletion assignment as well? Geez, it's my last assignment. No stealing!. Lol. No, I spotted the page on Huggle, and, its quite obviously nonsense, so, I tagged it. Also, are you on the Counter Vandalism Unit? Steve Crossin (talk) 02:42, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Sleep? That's something I haven't done a lot recently. It's Sunday, 1.45pm here. I slept 5 hours last night 5am-10am). before then, no sleep since thursday. I hate vandals. The sooner CVU is working again, the better. Steve Crossin (talk) 02:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

• Agreed. Some people clearly have no life. Well, I'd rather deal with real people causing vandalism, rather than a vandalbot :O. I've asked for a StatusBot to be made for CVU's use, so the task force can get working properly again. Steve Crossin (talk) 02:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

• Hi, I was just wondering, do you use Huggle? If you don't, you should :) Steve Crossin (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Glad you liked it

And thanks for the barnstar. Much appreciated! Happy editing, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the compliment on my username

tyvmSmashbrosboy 03:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Roman Catholic Church

There is a revote on the FA leave comments page of this article. You are invited to reexamine the article and either confirm or deny your previous support vote by voting again. Thanks. NancyHeise (talk) 08:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Secret page

Kindly move your secret page out of mainspace. Such games are by tradition accepted in your userspace, but nowhere else. alternatively, I will administratively delete it as housekeeping. DGG (talk) 14:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)--thanks DGG (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The Constant or The Economist?

[3] Will ^(talk) 16:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Template

• Hi there, I've downgraded the level to 2. Level one should never be used, ideally, and is generally used only if there is a vandalbot on the loose. Just thought I should let you know. Steve Crossin (talk) 03:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiCup

The WikiCup has begun, best wishes for the tournament.

STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 22:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Awards Center Newsletter

I'm pleased to announce that the Awards Center will be getting its own newsletter shortly. If you want to receive the WP:AWC newsletter, put your name here. --Sharkface217 21:00, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Award Center Newsletter, Edition 1

The Wikipedia Awards Center Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 1 • April 02, 2008 • About the Newsletter
Useful Links In case you ever get lost: Award Center AWC Collaboration of the Fortnight	New sponsored challenges New challenges include: Princess Mononoke Gene Wilder Checklist Aberdeen Grammar School Nominate some articles for AWC! News: WP:ACCOTF, the Award Center Collaboration of the Fortnight, is launched officially. Sign up for this fortnight's collaboration here. This newsletter is officially launched. I hope everyone likes it. If you have any ideas for future issues, talk to the editor. Completed challenges have been removed from the Award Center in the interest of space, as navigating the page can be arduous.	Collaboration of the Fortnight United States-Australia Relations
Archives • Random Challenge

- Newsletter Bot Talk 23:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC) The above newsletter was delivered by Newsletterbot. If you would not like to receive the newsletter, please add your name here

Hello, KC109! A project you are involved in, The WikiCup ,has signed up for automatic message delivery from StormBot, an automated bot account using AutoWikiBrowser. StormBot will be delivering you news and notifications about the project on your talk page. If anything is wrong or you have any suggestions to make, please notify the creator, Stormtracker94. Thank you. This message was delivered by StormBot StormBot (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

RE:

Yeah, I decided to come back. I like it! Tiptoety ^talk 03:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Sig

New sig or userpage? I can do both for you. The Chronic 23:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I recommend going for something like my old userpage, it was really quite nice and The Chronic is good at making it. Tiptoety ^talk 00:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for supporting

Thanks for supporting me in the AIV when you said "this is definently a hoax" or something like that. Also, I'm about your age too.--RyRy5 ^{Talk to RyRy} 03:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

MLK

I commented at WP:GAR that this article has a long way to go. I would encouage more work before nomintating.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Signature

Feel free to steal it. Be warned, however, that it's cursed. --Sharkface^T/_C 01:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Indeed. But feel free to steal it if it makes you happy. --Sharkface^T/_C 01:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I will see you around. Wikipedia's a small place. And as for the Award Center, I was only it's keeper. The page belongs to Wikipedia and the greater community. I neither founded it nor currently run it (as it was recently moved over to it's own project page). I was merely it's janitor for a short period of time. But I am glad that you find the page to be useful. --Sharkface^T/_C 01:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

No problemo. --Sharkface^T/_C 14:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar mate. Rgoodermote  01:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Help With Your Page

Hi! So, you said you want help with your page? Like, would you like a navigation box on your page, a border, or a few other things? Just tell me, and I'll be able to help. :-) --Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. (talk) 21:39, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok! I will get that done. Your page should be done by the end of Saturday. Does that sound good?--Listen to your Princess, dear Wikipedians. (talk) 02:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Award Center Newsletter

Issue 2 • April 28, 2008

New sponsored challenges New challenges include: List building drive: Pick a list and improve it 12-Hour Clock to GA Create 40 new pages Add citations for Foghorn Leghorn and The Barnyard Dawg Add an infobox to 25 articles Expand 1974 NBA Playoffs News The newsletter has been redesigned. Thank you to WBOSITG, MFC, and IMatthew for your design contributions. This shiny new newsletter is a result of their combined efforts. Thank you to Enigmaman for participating in the previous Award Center Collaboration of the Fortnight. Please note that if you wish to be given credit for work completed, you must sign up for the collaboration first. This week's collaboration is Luc Besson. Apologies for the late newsletter. The editor has been swamped lately due to school and vacation. If in the future a fortnightly delivery schedule cannot be kept, this newsletter will be delivered monthly. A lively discussion about the future of the Award Center is currently being being hosted on the Award Center talk page. Input is always welcome.

Useful Links In case you ever get lost: Award Center AWC Collaboration of the Fortnight Collaboration of the Fortnight Luc Besson More Links Archives Random Challenge About the Newsletter

- Newsletter Bot Talk 20:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC) This newsletter was delivered by Newsletterbot (talk • contribs • count) If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.