User talk:Ifoughtme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - BanyanTree 01:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. - BanyanTree 02:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Look, make a new account. The message you'll get will screw up the browser. I was posting on MediaWiki talk:Welcomecreation because what they did forced me to reload wikipedia! The admin that blocked me had no reason, I removed the bad title I had and my post had no offense lagnauge. I made that joke edit on Talk:Main Page for fun, but the MediaWiki stuff was real. This admin had no right to block me."

Decline reason: "Edits such as [1] and [2] make this block justified, there's no reason for stuff like that. Wait the 24 hours and then come back and edit constructively. When you are unblocked, you might want to bring up your problem with the welcome screen at the village pump (technical) — John Reaves (talk) 03:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The admin that looked at my edits was a dumbass."

Decline reason: "I think not. Denied — IrishGuy talk 03:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I've extended your block 2 more days. John Reaves (talk) 03:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

And I've left a note on MediaWiki talk:Welcomecreation and the talk page of the blocking admin requesting this block be reversed. You concern was valid, no matter how poorly a choice of words. This block, and the extension, are not appropriate. - auburnpilot talk 03:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Someone whose first edit is to make fun of Raul on Talk:Main Page obviously isn't a new user and obviously isn't here to be constructive. John Reaves (talk) 03:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
That is what warnings are for. We do not block people for one time offenses. And "hint" there's more than one Raul in the world. - auburnpilot talk 03:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Did you look at the diff? It's pretty obvious whick Raul he is talking about. John Reaves (talk) 03:50, 10 May 2007 (UTC)