From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Huitzilatzin was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Reviewed version: May 13, 2007
|
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
| WikiProject Mesoamerica (Rated Start-Class) (Rated Low-importance) |
 |
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page. |
Resources and guidelines for editing Mesoamerica-related articles:
Guidelines— Outline of suggested guidelines and editing conventions
Resources— Selected resources and compendia of Mesoamerican sources and studies
Citations— Bibliography and pre-filled citations for Mesoamerican sources
Journals— Links to selected journals publishing Mesoamerican research, example citation templates
Article listing— Inventory and watchlists of WP:MESO articles and their talk pages (Article Watchlist)—(Talkpage Watchlist)
Worklists— Project worklists and activities
|
| NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. |
| Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's importance scale. |
|
|
This article is also supported by the WikiProject Aztec sub-project. |
WikiProject Mesoamerica priority open tasks: (click "show" to expand)
|
| WikiProject Mexico (Rated Start-Class) |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
[edit] GA Review
I've put this on hold, but I'm seriously close to failing this one (no offence, and that applies to all I am going to say)
Problems:
- The article is 3.8KB approx., and probably about half of that is notes. In fact, I dont think it would be irrational for someone to actually mark the article as a stub. Please, expand at least probably by twice. I know size can often not be a huge factor in GA noms, but 3.8KB is just out of the ballpark.
- An obvious factor that comes with length is also more depth for the 1. information that is already there and 2.the information that is to (hopefully) come. Please, expand the article and explain as much of you can. Perhaps a 'Background' section might be possible, explaining or giving some more factual information/context/depth to the text (maybe give more information about the civilisation that he ruled?). A 'Later/Future Rulers/Successors section may also help. Adding these contexts provide a cheap disguise (for want of a better word) for the real lack of information that you have on the main subject, but can also help give some good, useful background information for readers to compare the main subject to. These contexts can lengthen an article considerably.
- While this is not an actual problem, it would certainly serve as a bonus in my mind to the article - an image or two. Images can often provide much valuable information, and are quite common is GAs.
Positives:
- Many references (although, as aforementioned, comprise about half the actual article). Try to find sources for the 'citation needed' information.
- A few categories.
- Nice use of two infoboxes.
- Many wikilinks.
Summing Up:
Most things are ok, but length is the major problem - the article is simply too short (and, if I may say, too stubbish) to be a GA at the moment, or even a B class. Also, try and work on finding some images. A bit of background information would also be appreciated, perhaps on the region, other future rulers and/or other relevent information. You have 7 days to make this GA standard, so I think you should really work on this, otherwise I'm going to have to fail this. I hope you are able to make the necessary improvements in the allocated time. Sincerely, —A • D Torque 10:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Failed
Gave you a week, no changes; subsequently failed. Thanks, —A • D Torque 06:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)