Talk:Fawcett Publications

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Fawcett Publications was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 2, 2006 Good article nominee Listed June 2, 2008 Good article reassessment Delisted Current Status: Delisted good article

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

	Business and economics Portal This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject.
Start	rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale
Low	rated as low-importance on the assessment scale

As of May 13, '05 absoletly none of the edits in this article's history have the 'edit summary' field filled in. Please provide a brief comment for each edit that isn's marked as 'minor'. ike9898 20:33, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Prathervanish.jpg

Image:Prathervanish.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Automatic addition of "class=GA"

A bot has added class=GA to the WikiProject banners on this page, as it's listed as a good article. If you see a mistake, please revert, and leave a note on the bot's talk page. Thanks, _BOT Giggabot (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA SAweep—delisted

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of June 2, 2008, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR. Ruslik (talk) 07:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The reasons:

1) The lead it too short. It should be 3-4 paragraphs long.

2) There are few citations in the text.

3) Many references have only titles and weblinks, some of them are dead. The information about publishers, authors, date and years of publication should be provided as well.

4) 'The Fawcett family' section contains a large extract from 'Notes on the Fawcett Family' of Roger Fawcett. However this extract is long for a simple quotation and may have copyright problems. It is not even properly atributed because the ref 8 is dead.

Ruslik (talk) 07:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I've added more references and more info in references. For "Fawcett Family" I have added two references directly to Travis Fawcett, who is the sole source of the "Fawcett Family" ms. (which may have been published only on the Internet and without a copyright). Pepso2 (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)