Talk:Faction Paradox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doctor Who WikiProject

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

"Faction Paradox take a perverse pride in causing time paradoxes" is a fallacy. They in fact do not cause time paradoxes, and the name is purely incedental (in fact used to irritate the great houses) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.153.183.227 (talk • contribs) 10:49, April 12, 2005 (UTC)

Surely in 'Movers' and 'A Labyrinth of Histories' we see Godfather Sabbath creating multiple paradoxes in his own family tree as an initiation ceremony to the Faction? I'm sure there are other examples that don't come to mind right now... The cousin in Alien Bodies who fails is made to kill himself in some sort of paradoxical way, isn't he? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Achinton (talk • contribs) 13:49, June 26, 2005 (UTC)
Yes I'm pretty sure he is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.56.63.230 (talk • contribs) 21:34, April 11, 2006 (UTC)

Has anyone got any information on factionparadox.co.uk? Page seems to have been down forever now. Is there an internet archive of it that can be used, as it seems a shame to take the page down completely, as it was a great page way back when... SalemMacGourley 13:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)