User talk:Ernest the Sheep

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Pavlova 2 Nancy Wake 3 Nicole Kidman 4 Sockpuppetting 5 Warning:3RR

[edit] Pavlova

Here on Wikipedia, there is a thing called due process. If you believe that the article is so biased, why don't you contact another editor to review the article, preferably a sysops. If you do not wish to do this, you are more than welcome to do the editing yourself. Just let it be noted that your changes, unless substantially referenced and proven, will be reverted immediately. Also, please try to remain civil on the Pavlova talk page. Thanks! Matt (talk) 04:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nancy Wake

Why are you removing references and information from Nancy Wake? The ref you removed is certainly relevant. The information about the 2003 heart attack and being wheelchair-bound is unsourced but rather likely to be true; you are within your rights to remove it under WP:BLP but asking for a citation might be more appropriate in this case. A quick glance shows that User:KizzyB is making useful edits.-gadfium 20:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I removed the link to the rsa.org.nz article, as well as the comments on her health as I deemed them worthless. At the grand age of 95 frailty is a fact of life. It may of course have some relevance, but in the context of what is a rather sparse article such details add nothing, in fact they can detract. If contributors want to improve articles then I would suggest proper research of her life story would be better than piece meal offerings of stories and links obtained from internet searches. The rsa.org.nz item was quaint, but there is no good reason to include it ahead of numerous other links to be found on the internet.Ernest the Sheep (talk) 22:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

If you have better references, please add them. I think the RSA website is an excellent reference for a statement that the RSA gave her a medal. I have restored the content.-gadfium 23:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I Couldn't agree less. The fact the RSA gave her a medal is not in dispute. The reference is therefore unnecessary. I've now removed it.Ernest the Sheep (talk) 02:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I have restored the reference. Removing it is vandalism. Please consider this a formal warning.-gadfium 04:39, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nicole Kidman

Please see the article's talk page and request for comment, and add your views. Please do not revert again, but discuss on the talk page. Continued reversions will result in a block. Thanks,Swampfire (talk) 15:42, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetting

I thought i would let you know I have expressed concern to you using 124.190.91.146 as an IP address to commit vandalism and avoid the three revert rule. I am not sure of this though, as you repetitivly claim to be a New Zealander and the IP is an Australian one (although you usually edit from an Australian POV, and use alot of Australian expressions. For the benefit of everyone however, could we clear this up quickly? Either sign out and reply to my talk page with an IP address, or i will request a checkuser. Best, Matt (talk) 08:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warning:3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russell Crowe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. You will be blocked on the next revert. Matt (talk) 09:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)