Talk:Eileen and Robert Mason Pollock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Television Portal This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-Importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

[edit] 2 NOT 1

THIS SHOULD BE TWO FUCKING PGS, NOT 1. THEY ARE INDIVIDUALS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.104.73 (talk) 03:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Wow, why the anger and language? They are individuals, but the article is a stub, they are only notable as a couple/writing team, and all available references/credits (right now) are of them as a couple. Why have two identical/redundant stubs at this point? Sheesh. — TAnthony^Talk 03:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

In response to the latest "split" tag, I see no reason for 2 identical stubs. Even if expanded, I can't imagine there will be enough notable and sourced individual info worthy of separate articles. There are plenty of other combined articles, some of which are even more extensive and notable, like the Kray twins. — TAnthony^Talk 08:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)