User talk:Dysepsion/Archive 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Thank You

I just wanted to express a hearty "thank you" for the newest star...I am pleased someone is noticing and appreciative of my work. Thanks!Jmlk17 06:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] This one belong to you!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I, Jmlk17, award you this anti-vandalism barnstar for your incomparable anti-vandalism work, as well as your tireless reverting of the said vandalism. You do more than your fair share of it. Keep up the great work! Jmlk17 08:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Also thank you!

I definitely didn't expect that when I woke up. Thank you for the barnstar, I appreciate it! I'm also glad to know that someone is noticing my edits. :) --ImmortalGoddezz 14:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oy

You accidentally undid the error of the wrong user, 35.11.244.160 was undoing the vandalization of another editor. Just letting you know. No worries, best of luck in your vandal hunting. --.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 02:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] my comment

you don tgo to the school so how would you know about what goes on the program thing it stupid and pointless because all we do in there is sit and talk it doesnt help me or anyone else i am still failing so dont say any thing about what you dont know —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.33.133.178 (talk) 02:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC).

if you actually sit there and chamge something that is true even though it is opionated YOU HAVE NO LIFE

[edit] WikiProject Columbia University

Greetings, fellow Columbian. I just created a WikiProject dedicated to Columbia University, the schools, environs, and the notable people who notably affiliated with it. If you want to be part of it, please check out WP:Columbia. It is very barebones right now, but with your help we can expand it and make it fully functional. --Valley2city₪‽ 07:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You

Thank you for reverting the edits to my talk page. Moorematthews 14:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My userpage

Thank you for reverting that. Simply south 19:38, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Thanks

No prob. Have a great week! --Ann Stouter 06:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

....for doing that for me. It's all yours again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.97.37.10 (talk) 02:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Again thanks...

That last vandalism was a joke, don't worry I'm through, I love Wikipedia and have used it many times in my daily life. So no more from me because frankly I'm tired and I could less. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.97.37.10 (talk) 03:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Image:Jennifer Walcott-D.jpg need licence

The image Commons:Image:Jennifer Walcott-D.jpg at Commons need a licence, I think you just forgot to add one. Someone asked about it on the Help desk. Nice image by the way! Great to see a free image of a living person for a change :-)--Commander Keane 05:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Just checking in

Hey buddy. Haven't talked to you in quite some time, but was just stopping by to say hello. I've been keeping all the NIFC articles on my watchlist the past month or so, and I consistently see you reverting and editing all sorts of articles. We need more guys like you around here to keep out the vandals! Keep it up man! Jmlk17 02:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Irvine sucks

They only accept Asian people. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.107.183.141 (talk) 23:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:White_carnation.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:White_carnation.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MER-C 05:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:September1962.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:September1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Flag of the Holy See.gif

Hello, Dysepsion. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Flag of the Holy See.gif) was found at the following location: User:Dysepsion. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 03:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wow

The Original Barnstar
For your amazing contributions to Phi Delta Theta. Acidskater 06:04, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
The edits you made on Phi Delta Theta are just amazing. I can't even imagine how long it took you to put that all together. Acidskater 20:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fishing revisions

First of all, I would like to thank you for actively guarding our Fishing Project. I've seen all your efforts of protecting the Fishing article from those harmful vandals. I've made a major revision from all those revisions/reverts that were made previously by bots and other wikipedians because some of the important information there were lost despite the effort of each and everyone to guard the said article. Thanks and more power! Bu b0y2007 01:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dysepsion! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel 04:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Greetngs, fellow vandalism fighter

I think we were on the same wavelength tonight. Whenever I tried to revert vandalism, you beat me to it! Thanks for fighting the good fight. EleosPrime 03:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey there, I'm just getting to know Vandal Prime, but there is a lot going on in the window. How do I know what level warning to give? And if I give the one warning that the next step is blocking, how does that happen? Thanks for the assist. EleosPrime 19:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Hm, I think I got it. EleosPrime 19:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I just got your reply, and I think I figured it out. In the top right of the Vandal Proof window, under all the rollback buttons, it reads: 'xxx.xxx.xx.xx has received no vandalism warnings'. Sometimes, I see one or two or three. I think it just takes some getting used to the abbreviations. Keep fighting the good fight! EleosPrime 19:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)


The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For fighting the good fight against vandalism! EleosPrime 20:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page (damn' you're quick :-D) - Myanw 21:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phi Psi Vandalism

Good Job catching the malicious vandalism of the Phi Psi page. Do you think any action should be taken against the vandal at 68.58.82.221? I have a strong suspicion that this type of vandalism is going to continue? Samwisep86 02:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

I got an article, Jimmy Launders and I was wondering if you could add the military template to the talk page? --Whsitchy 05:23, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I can't think of anything at the moment. --Whsitchy 05:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tom DeLonge

Yea, sorry about that. It was just so I could take a screencap for a friend. Rather immature I know, but I was gonna change it right back... You got in there pretty quick!

Won't happen again 88.104.157.38 18:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SORRY ABOUT STORFRONT THING

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.246.148.175 (talk • contribs)

[edit] 28 Guildwars--sorry, you got the wrong guy

I just restarted my machine AND modem (which on my ISP gives me a new IP) and now I have this message about how "[a]t least one of [my] recent edits, such as the one you made to Guild Wars, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed..." when I have never even freaking heard of Guild Wars, far less edited that page. This messaging system needs to find a way to take dynamic IP addresses into account. No clue as to who had this IP before me, but you flagged the wrong user. Have a nice day. 72.155.102.124 00:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please explain more fully

I find {{afd}}s incredibly draining. Forgive me for leaving you a message on your talk page, but I really hope you will try to explain something to me.

The article contains ten factors for and against Said Zaid's continued detention. The entire last half of the article in fact. I am really confused as to why you don't consider these "factors" to be about Said Zaid. No offense -- just cause I am confused I have to check this out -- did you think all the captives faced these same ten allegations? Well they don't.

Now, if you were told me you didn't think that the factors were individual enough to match some criteria you think is important I would (probably) disagree with you, but at least I would understand you.

But saying only the first sentence, or first paragraph, mentions him - that I don't understand.

Frankly, I can't escape the feeling that no-one is showing me the courtesy to actually read the article, or even scan it over, before casting their vote. And it is really upsetting me.

Thanks for taking one minute to answer this. Geo Swan 19:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rfa

Hey buddy, I passed my RFA, and am now an admin. Thanks for the vote of confidence man, and I will be seeing you around the project here :). Jmlk17 03:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Admin

Hey again buddy. You remember I was given admin tools around here a little bit ago, and I'm having a blast diving ever-deeper into Wikipedia. But I have a question for ya: you ever think about doing it yourself? We could use editors like you around here...let me know :) Jmlk17 09:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Sounds good :). I like the reason(s) you gave me, and it's quite respectable. I'm going to bug you about it in a couple months. Actually, bug is the wrong word, but I'll bring it back up with you later this summer if that's alright with you. Happy editing bro! Jmlk17 03:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Katie Lohmann

I've blocked the editor for 48 hours. If the vandalism resumes after the block expires, try to get him/her to discuss their reasons on the Talk page. If there's no reply and they keep going at it, I'll extend the block. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 20:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Maui_Taylor_(publicity_for_Hibla_movie).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Maui_Taylor_(publicity_for_Hibla_movie).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. bluemask (talk) 08:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Katya Santos.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Katya Santos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Maui Taylor (publicity for Hibla movie).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Maui Taylor (publicity for Hibla movie).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:69.22.193.254‎ Final Warning- Romeo and Juliet

We must of assigned the warning for the same infraction at the same time because I had been watching that user since their first warning. Actually we must of reverted the edits at the same time to because when I looked at the history you were credited with the revert. TW usually stops if someone reverts an article before the scripts complete. Anyways I guess none of this matters since this user is no longer vandalizing anything. AngielaJ 22:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] James Irvine

Care to help with this? James Irvine redirects to his son - which should not be. They are both notable enough to have an article about them. The page to which it is redirected, although titled the Junior, contains information about the father, and not the son. I noticed you set up the redirect, so I wanted to contact you as I am resetting it. James Irvine needs to go to James Irvine, and not his son, don't you think? the_undertow talk 00:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 03:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sigma kappa badge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sigma kappa badge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Miriam Gonzalez

I want to apologize for deleting picture of Miriam. I wanted to change the picture, to put some more interesting (not nude), but I don't know how to do that. Sorry!

[edit] Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 01:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Anna Svidersky

Howdy! Back in May 2006 you participated in an AfD discussion on the Anna Svidersky article. There is currently a Request for comment on the talk page of the Svidersky article aimed at resolving a disagreement over the state of the article and the use of the Anna Svidersky title as a redirect to the Mourning Sickness article that was created during the 2nd Svidersky AfD. I hope you don't mind the interruption. Any additional or outside input would be greatly appreciated by all the editors on the Svidersky page. Thank you for your time. AgneCheese/Wine 14:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XVIII (August 2007)

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Alpha Sigma Alpha Crest.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Alpha Sigma Alpha Crest.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 16:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lambda Chi Alpha

Thank you for reverting the edits to the Lambda Chi Alpha page this morning. Keep up the good work! Airpear 13:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pi kappa alpha new member pin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pi kappa alpha new member pin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 13:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: erik Eastaugh

Have renominated it for deletion, notice you voted against last time. If you have views either way, it should speed up what appears to be a clear deletion this time around.

Ta —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] request for comment on Hugh Hefner

Please take the time to go to Hugh Hefner's talkpage and respomd to the request for comment on what jerrygraf is trying to add that does not belong on Hugh Hefner's page, but belongs on PEI's, as well as the part i deleted is ment as a negative comment onn the biography of a living personRogue Gremlin 04:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Holly Madison photos

Image:Holly Madison-1.jpg, 250 × 375 pixel
Image:Holly Madison-1.jpg, 250 × 375 pixel
Image:Holly Madison-D.jpg, 256 × 384 pixel
Image:Holly Madison-D.jpg, 256 × 384 pixel

The Image:Holly Madison-1.jpg does show more long hair, also brings in someone else's checked shoulder, has some horrible reflection in the pupils, and is smaller for some reason. If those are the only two choices, I'd go with the older one, Image:Holly Madison-D.jpg. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 16:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for the images

Just wanted to thank you for all the images that you've added here and at the Commons. I also find it interesting how much work you've put into articles on Catholicism while submitting so many images of Playboy Playmates. I find the irony amusing.  :-) Dismas|(talk) 22:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

You do not impress me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.215.153.182 (talk) 23:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XX (October 2007)

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 13:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I am new to Wiki edit, etc

...thanks for the advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Almaalday62 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting my edits to "Xiamen"

The original text says, "Currently, there are nine Asian cities that have direct flights to Xiamen. They are Penang, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, Jakarta, Osaka, Nagoya, Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore and Bangkok. Cities outside China's mainland that have direct flights to Xiamen are Hong Kong and Macau which are situated on Guangdong province's southern border."

If one looks at the first sentence, then it seems to imply that there are no other Asian cities that have direct flights to Xiamen. This would be an incorrect conclusion as there are many Chinese cities that have direct flights to and from Xiamen. That's why I propose to add the words "non-Chinese" after the word Asian in that first sentence.


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St. Hubert Catholic High School Seal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:St. Hubert Catholic High School Seal.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Another restaurant to review

I saw your comments on The Hat last week (which didn't get deleted BTW). Thought you might want to weigh in on The Crab Cooker. :) --evrik (talk) 15:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)