User talk:Dralansun

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] ALL who believes in ONE RELIGION – 'HUMANISM'

: Invitation & Appeal to

Wiki India Project,
Wiki Global Project,
Wiki other countries’ project,
Hi,'

Thank you to come on this page . This is of course your page not mine. I am an English , a non- Indian , studying researching specially on Indian or certain countries Spirituality & Philosophy. I am still trying to learn Hindi but so far could hopelessly read, talk but am learning to understand it. Sorry I can't write Hindi yet.

Presently, I am writing contributing, researching on this project of a poet & philosopher Naresh Sonee Sohum Sutra & his sacred scripture Brhmaand Pujan – ‘Universal Prayers’ Any person who believes in universal 'Spirituality-Philosophy of Humanism’ or believes that religion has become absolutely and highly professionalize by religious self certified, self authorized quacks , care takers who frame,fame and float out, all sort of outdated old myths, superstitions without decoding logics could research and analyze here with me in this project.

For instance: We come across various examples from history that -Genuine revolutionary Philanthropists , Poets & Philosophers rarely run or lust out to grab fame & fortune. Seers say- If they do so they are not true angels but as good as same old human like us. Such ‘P’ breed of innovatory preachers are not puppet of any prophet. They are predictors of time, think and act far ahead of time. Always updated. They have guts to act against tide of time. They see far beyond the next coming future. Past for them is history , Future for them is sane sense full creativity . They see fruits of far future , so they sow the seed of new , next revolution in their present, giving us in the form of future ‘present’ (gift)to get carry forward for the next generation.

Revolutionary change come when a seed is sowed. 'One' seed springs out a tree which get many branches.The same carry fruits and the seed is thrown again to decay in waste. But one fine day a seed find a way and again grows into a new formed tree & give fruits for others to eat and benefit for health and happiness. The same is ‘wisdom seed’. More they are ignored or thrown , they never remain alone. The more one try to throw all in waste to decay, some how some day , some or one seed , some where grows , erupts, arose time & again forms into one or many trees, branches, fruits & seeds.

However, and over all if you too possess an idiotic dream like ‘Naresh Sonee Sohum Sutra’ that in near future our globe groom up and grow, merging and mingling in ‘One Religion’–said to be ‘Humanism ’ absolutely ignorance-free, illiteracy-free, hatred-free, terror-free , conflict-free, violence-free, enemy-free , disease-free , poverty-free, can come along this open free platform to help these pages to grow up further for the basic welfares of updated modern wisdoms which are the crucial need of the present and future mankind.

And , after reading these pages if ‘research editors contributors’ believe these pages to sustain and grow for ever more. Please go on monitoring , guarding, nominating, voting , supporting , editing , improving, cleaning-up, modifying and beautifying such pages for HUMAN welfare or just wisdom growth of wikipedia’s world that spread knowledge and awareness to the seekers. Please also do see that envy or jealousy don’t sprung here to suppress or dislodge your genius genuine views you share here.

If you have any message for me please leave it on the bottom of my discussion or talk page please. The page invites & belongs to ‘All Contributing Editors’

Thanks & Sincere Regards
Alan Sun

[edit] Honour of thanks to guiding & guarding editors journalists

Who are supporting these pages.They are the generous genius angel editors who are responsible to keep the page spirit on. They always stand beside any logical justification and help/solve out.

Graeme Bartlett User talk:Graeme Bartlett
Aleta Aleta (talk)
Nishika64 Nishkid64 (talk)
Kabigula Kubigula (talk)
Maquahuitl Maquahuitl (talk)Hindi translator
FaizHaider Sayed Mohd Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk)Hindi Translator
Eukesh Eukesh (talk)


Editors If you have any message leave the same on the bottom of this page --Dralansun (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


Dear Kubigula , Naresh Sonee & Brhmaand Pujan the news & reviews as notblility /sources were submitted & request is made to re create these pages.Editors who learn more about the sources --Dralansun (talk) 13:31, 31 December 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Yes

What do you want to know?Maquahuitl (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Are you an Indian?Maquahuitl (talk) 08:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yes

I know Hindi & can translate in Hindi. I'll try to work on your request
Sayed Mohd Faiz Haider Rizvi (talk) 14:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] S 0 n e e clean up

Hi Alan, I have altered my talk pages so that the first name is split, and will not match search criteria any more. Hopefully search engines will drop off the entries in the next day. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Level 2 headers

Hi Alan, It is generally preferable to use level 2 headers to create new sections of pages. To do so, write ==Header text==. Note that there are two equal signs on each side of the text. Please try to do this in the future to conform to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style Thanks! Aleta (Sing) 15:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] About your request in my page

Hi, I am from Nepal and not Northern India. The availability of Hindi newspapers here is very limited. So, I do not know much about Hindi newspapers. However, I know Hindi moderately well and am admin in Hindi wikipedia. If you want me to help you in a particular manner, please specify. I am willing to work on this subject. Thank you.--Eukesh (talk) 15:40, --Dralansun (talk) 15:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)12 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Research-Editors are invited on Brhmaand Pujan page

Prior, thank you , you generous & genius esteemed research editors who are coming forward on this page project ,taking out your valuable time & brain for guarding & guiding , Brhmaand Pujan ‘s & Naresh Sonee ‘s important information to Wikipedia.


We plead & invite you time& again to check-read-verify this site so that no opposer could play with your hard work. From this site- http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ You may translate all news-reviews from ‘Hindi to English’ providing the NewsPaper Names, Date,Title of column etc. Meanwhile, translate them to exact-n-accurate as they are published in News-Reviews’ .These cut outs are collected from leading & prominent news papers of India only to help grow research on the pages in question. If you become the first or teaming contributor to help translation of the work in question. You may self ly add your work to your own talk page for references notifying your ability.

The collective team to task or any individual translator further is requested - Prior to posting their translations/views /info or link to the main page. Beware, that your valuable hard work may not be disturbed/distorted/deleted by other editors on one or other reasons of objections. So before one may post the exact & accurate translation on my talk page giving News papers name, heading / title / details, so that anyone of your good self can easily access, discuss, debate, edit, improve & clean up before it finally go to appear on the main pages. However, If no objection is raised within 10 days your self can self ly post your hard work of translations, parting info, views on main pages even. So that the stub page may grow. As this would be considered that there is no objection from any side. The researching -translating team or any individual editor on task selfly can post the translations along with links under the ‘references’ of main page. Brhmaand Pujan & Naresh Sonee. All editors find them free to post the translation/views/info or links to the main pages,. Thank you with regards- Alan Sun--Dralansun (talk) 15:18, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I invite & seek Translation of News-Reviews from the below site

Brhmaand Pujan

http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/

Which can be used only for 'Fair Purpose' Translation- Hindi to English & other languages too. This site would be updated time to time, Meanwhile, I invite the research editors team, seeking & extending your ‘Individual Translations’ help-support –‘all or any’ one after another, If some pictures or words are not visible or too small to read, In such condition, you may temporary save them in your computer’s folder/files and then magnify & view them on your monitor screen. After translating them, your good self can post them on my talk page with exact & accurate details.

However, the name of the News Papers , Date of publications, Title of News / Reviews , along with the matter is important. Thank you heartily, in anticipation. --Dralansun (talk) 16:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Wiki India Project Editors

Wiki India Project Editors can come forward to help Naresh Sonee Sohum Sutra & Brhmaand Pujan page grow.

Below site give news and reviews in Hindi from some of the leading Hindi News Papers of India
http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/
(Clean-up, Beautification & Translation in English required to support this stub article)

[edit] Naresh Sonee

Hi Dralansun - as you're aware, there was a consensus to delete a page previously existing on this subject at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naresh Sonee. After reviewing the content of the previously-deleted article and of the new one that you created, I determined that there was nothing in the new one that wasn't in the old one - certainly nothing to make the deletion discussion less applicable. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 05:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recreating pages

Please stop recreating pages about Naresh Sonee [Sohum Sutra] and Brhma[a]nd Pujan. They were both deleted through the AfD process; if you want to contest this decision, it needs to go through Wikipedia:Deletion review. Zetawoof(ζ) 05:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Repost of Brhmand Pujan

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Brhmand Pujan, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Brhmand Pujan was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Brhmand Pujan, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi Dralansun - your article was deleted, despite the {{hangon}} tag, because it was a recreation of an article that was previously deleted through the WP:Articles for Deletion process. Please do not create it (or its talk page) again. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 07:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Urge-Notice to Editors helping Brhmand Pujan to grow

What I feel not only my article but even I am orphaned on wikipedia as well. What I so far had have concluded , very few angels are there to protect hopeless lone person like me or my hard put work. From the surviving truth that all were erased in past except this small para of article Brhmand Pujan. How it succeeded to sustained till date God knows? Today , I don’t know what wrong I did in pleading Zetawoof to remove my letters of appeal from his talk page as they are giving wrong signals on search engine hits. The next minute what he did was to come on our article and warn to destroy the page highlighting a deletion banner. Is the humiliation me or my article not over yet ? What wrong I did today in requesting him? You see, It was only a humble request to him. Now what I feel the day is very close that this particular page also would be destroyed by some egoist self employed gang who does not believe in supportive creations on wikipedia. As we would be scare in two terms – shortage of votes or otherwise. How long could I ask or search invisible angels like you, Aleta, Graeme, Eukesh and others. I once again appeal to you to do the needful and let ‘truth of transparent sense survive’ in wikipedia where populated and condensed bias & egos are ruling on counted roost. I would ask the Guardians of Wikipedia - Do Zetawoof or people alike bother a least to honor the previous instructing banners that support our article which has been advised to grow as the same only lack due to ‘orphaned or stubbed’. In past let we ask honorable judges to interfere. Regards to all of you . --Dralansun (talk) 07:07, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Urge-Notice to Editors helping Brhmand Pujan to grow

What I feel not only my article but even I am orphaned on wikipedia as well. What I so far had have concluded , very few angels are there to protect hopeless lone person like me or my hard put work. From the surviving truth that all were erased in past except this small para of article Brhmand Pujan. How it succeeded to sustained till date God knows? Today , I don’t know what wrong I did in pleading Zetawoof to remove my letters of appeal from his talk page as they are giving wrong signals on search engine hits. The next minute what he did was to come on our article and warn to destroy the page highlighting a deletion banner. Is the humiliation me or my article not over yet ? What wrong I did today in requesting him? You see, It was only a humble request to him. Now what I feel the day is very close that this particular page also would be destroyed by some egoist self employed gang who does not believe in supportive creations on wikipedia. As we would be scare in two terms – shortage of votes or otherwise. How long could I ask or search invisible angels like you, Aleta, Graeme, Eukesh and others. I once again appeal to you to do the needful and let ‘truth of transparent sense survive’ in wikipedia where populated and condensed bias & egos are ruling on counted roost. I would ask the Guardians of Wikipedia - Do Zetawoof or people alike bother a least to honor the previous instructing banners that support our article which has been advised to grow as the same only lack due to ‘orphaned or stubbed’. In past let we ask honorable judges to interfere. Regards to all of you .

[edit] Recreating deleted pages

Hi Alan, I'm afraid that it is standard procedure to speedily delete pages that are recreations of pages already deleted through articles for deletion. As someone has already suggested on this page, you can go to deletion review and appeal the deletions. If you (or anyone) just creates the pages over again though, they'll be re-deleted. At this point, I think if you want to pursue this, you should go to deletion review. Aleta (Sing) 04:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Not qualified

Hi Alan, I am not qualified to argue effectively for your topics. I know nothing of them beyond the little I remember from your articles, and I know no Hindi (or any other Indian language). Since, at this time it appears that English-language resources are not available about Naresh Sonee and his book, I am not able even to read enough to argue the case. I don't know how else to advise you at this point. Is there an article about Sonee in the Hindi, or any other language, version of Wikipedia? If his notability has been established elsewhere on the project, that could help your case here. In the meantime, you might want to work on another article to learn more about Wikipedia and have fun. Aleta (Sing) 22:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)