User talk:Graeme Bartlett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] talk

Hi Graeme, I am following a bit the discussion around a possible 'Hans Höger' article. I don't know Ilaria - she's probably from the Bocconi University, I am from the Bozen University, but I imagine that both of us know very well Mr. Höger. Outstanding qualities and characteristcs of Mr. Höger are in my opinion: - he is one of the very few design theorists who collaborates actively with such important institutions like International Design Conference of Aspen (IDCA) and Triennale di Milano - he is one of the few design theorists in Germany who is doing contributions to peer group magazines in Italy (domus, Abitare), Germany (form, Design Report) and Japan (Shift, Design News) - he is one of the few German design theorists (perhaps the only one) who is publishing books with publishing houses in Switzerland (Lars Müller, Birkhäuser), Italy (Abitare Segesta), Germany (Cantz) and France (Editions Pyramyd) - he is the only German design theorist included in the Design Research Map operation organized by the Universities of Milan and Genoa - he is one the very few design theorists who does not only work at an accademic level and network, but even with companies (as consultant): he is actively trying to link theory and practice - he created the idea/theory of "cultural engineering" - last but not least, an article about his activities and relationships has been accepted in Wikipedia Germany and Italy All those aspects, probably, are not sufficiently described in Ilaria's article; nevertheless, they can be read/perceived thanks to the informations Ilaria tried to resume. My question: the definition/criterion of "outstanding" could be considered fulfilled by the above listed characteristics of Mr. Höger's work? Many thanks for your help and advice, Andrea —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.206.186.101 (talk) 10:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett.

Older talk is in 1 2 archives.

If you want to know why I declined your article at WP:AFC please see User:Graeme Bartlett/decline

please add your talk below:

[edit] talk

Hi Graeme, many thanks for your comments on my proposal concerning Hans Höger. The main motivation for my proposal is that Mr. Höger is an active and internationally known member of the scientific design community. He is particularly commited to Design Research topics and international cooperations. In 2009 his book "Cultural Engineering" will be published. Concerning several important designers liks Sapper, Abraham, Sottsass, De Lucchi, he is one of the few international experts who published comprehensive works on those people. The Italian Design Research Map website is an independent website in which Höger's research projects and positions have been included (even with a video interview). I know that he is doing contributions in other international design networks as well - do you think, I should look for those informations and then try again to edit an article? Many thanks for your advices, ILARIA ANDREINI.

Hi Ilaria, we need something to show that Hans Höger is outstanding in his field amoungst his peers, just being active and known is not sufficient. If you can find that then please resubmit your article again with the extra references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


[edit] talk

Hi Graeme, thanks you input. I have found a wiki page in Japanese exists [ http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%B0%B4%E5%8E%9F%E5%B8%8C%E5%AD%90 ]. I will work on translateing this to english. Big in Japan or google requires more Kanji I suppose. Anyway, I imagine localizing a wiki-page will meet less scrutiny than trying to start from scratch or convince others a fashion model may have relavancy in an encyclopaedic world.

Also found this definition; Encyclopedia, noun: A reference work (often in several volumes) containing articles on various topics (often arranged in alphabetical order) dealing with the entire range of human knowledge or with some particular speciality.

So, I think regardless of how many hits a english(水原希子) google search reveals; articles on various topics dealing with the entire range of human knowledge or with some particular speciality, users can be served by a localized english version.

{{helpme}} I may need some assistance, are you willing to tutor me on wiki formating if I mess up?

Anyway, thanks again.

All the best!

Todd --TMDREHRB 07:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC)tmdrehrb

Hi Todd, I can help yo out with wikisyntax. My first suggestion to you is to sign your talk with the four tilde characters, ~~~~. The next suggestion is to add your talk to the bottom of the talk page, then I can find it easier. Let me know if you have something you want tme to look at. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:11, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] new

This was accidentally placed in your archive by another user. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello Graeme,

I am a little confused(but thats alright) about the reason for declineing the Article: Kiko Mizuhara (fashion model) for creation.

On the following Wiki-page; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivi_%28magazine%29 An accepted Wiki page obviously worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.(10 December 2007 Pinkpineapple (Talk | contribs) (2,259 bytes) (←Created page with '{{Infobox Magazine | title = ViVi
ヴィヴィ | image_file = Vivi-2006-11.jpg | image_size = 250px | image_caption = ViVi Nov...') )

Anyway, we notice herein, in the second paragraph a few names of famous Vivi models with links(blue) to their respective and accepted(for creation)Wiki-Bio pages also a list of curent and past models some of these also with links(blue) to their respective Wiki-Bio pages also. So, we note that such, is the precidence already set, in this and these(bio-type) acceptable Wiki pages obviously worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. ( Actually, i followed carefully the layout{{Infobox Model of one of these other models in preparing the Kiko Mizuhara (fashion model) article?)

Thus the decline is puzzling on the basis you stated and implied;(lack of?) importance or significance of the subject & the why the person or group is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia?

It seems to me the "importance or significance of the subject & the why the person or group is worthy of inclusion" is no longer a subjective matter as the accepted precidence followed thus far would make it a correct an objective criteria that has already passed the test for worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.

So, what gives? Do you require further; cite(ing) reliable, published third-party sources, so that the information in the article is verifiable? I think ample was given(though some is in Japanese language)?

So could you please explain what needs to happen in order to successfully, complete this submission for creation without deletion?

thanks.

Todd

or

--TMDREHRB 23:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)tmdrehrb

[edit] Speedy deletion of Tentative wound

A tag has been placed on Tentative wound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Madlobster (talk) 22:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes it's got to go. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ok thanks mate!

I appreciate your help. I will get to work on this localization. Keep an eye out here(watchlist or other?) and you can proof things and make suggestions, as they happen. Stand by a little though. In the mean time; what do you work on mainly? Anyway, again thanks. Hope to hear from you again soon. All the best!

Todd

P.s. I am very interested in geology as related to Oil & Gas discovery. Have tons of documents on these topics. Currently Tight shale foramtions and secondary recovery techniques are very common here. Lets have a dialog share info if you are interested./

TMDREHRB 08:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)tmdrehrb

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tmdrehrb"


[edit] Hi

Please understand that I am not trying to take issue with your points at a personal level - what concerns me is with what appears to be the general inactivity of OZ project and the default to the national noticeboard - the collective amnesia of the oz project on the issues that come up from more recent fly-by 'lets change this' type eds (who are new or recent) - leaves the oz project at peril of 'dumb down creep' - when it comes to nutting out the issues that at times need to be hammered out - so no big deal - but - hey there are no doubt plenty more issues to get revived by the 'fly bys' - eds who have never looked at archives or whatever - cheers SatuSuro 06:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your message - yeah well it seems something about the old 'be bold' idea does have its drawbacks - specially when things need to be talked about - I wouldnt be suprised if the bold thing falls away to more of a have a cup of tea/coffee whatever (oh thats right that got canned the other year or so as well) - oh well to something a bit more process oriented rather than the shoot first and talk after method :( SatuSuro 09:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Oops

Thanks. I was unaware of the deletion debate and it was deleted during my speedy rounds, as it came up in a batch of California-related deletions. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 21:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hiram Burnett

Hiram Burnett

This information is public domain and could be used for initial Wiki page material. Hiram Burnett was the manager of a lumber mill, co incorporator of the City of Seattle and founder of an Episcopal Church congregation Trinity which is now considered the most prestigious in Seattle. His son Charles Hiram was the Treasurer of Seattle. His grandson Charles Hiram Burnett Jr. was President of the Seattle City Council and Acting Mayor. His grand daughter Amy Louise Burnett was William Boeing's foster sister in law and the wife of Marshall Latham Bond. Thank You

http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~jtenlen/hburnett.txt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.240.206.207 (talk) 23:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

As manager of a lumber mill or the founder of one congregation does not make Hiram Burnett notable in my opinion, and neither does having notable relatives. However your can try your luck on WP:AFC. ANd see if someone else takes it up. Or you could register and create it yourself Hiram Burnett. Good luck with your improvements. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ok, thanks

Yea thanks man for clearing that up.

xIDoL —Preceding unsigned comment added by XIDoL (talk • contribs) 01:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quantum Wave Resistance of Schrodinger functions

This paper were published in "Condeced Matter" by the prominent american scientist, Tsu Raphael.

More info about Tsu (an assistant of Nobel Prize winner Esaki!) can be seen from

What reliable SOURSES do you want? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.47.212.108 (talk) 11:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quantum Wave Resistance

The article is worded as though it was a new discovery announced on wikipedia. This would count as original research. Your reference did not match any journal that I know of, however now that you ask for a review, the submission was a copyright violation of the abstract of http://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0311/0311479.pdf.

In addition to this problem, the term seems to be hardly used, so that the concept may be non notable.

Also your source is not reliable as this can take preprints from anywhere. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)