Talk:Desert Mountain High School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-Importance within Schools. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Arizona, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Arizona. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Stub-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] NOTICE TO NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW
"To maintain neutral point of view, no club or team or any group associated with this page besides Desert Mountain High School"
Quit the communist bullshit. Post whatever links you have to contribute to the education of the reader of the article.
Whatever user just deleted my above comments (check the history to see what they were) needs to know that this is a talk page, which means everybody gets their opinion. I appreciate your opinion, however, cursing is not necessary, and you need consensus of the talk page before adding a group...like the band. I do support the band very much, but the way the paragraph was written and how it was placed was not acceptable. If you wish to contribute, do so according to Wikipedia standards and with our approval. And always sign your comments... Compguy11 (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NOTICE TO EVERYONE
I am getting really sick of this. Wikipedia's rules state that people must have the consensus of the talk page before making major changes. Saying that three famous actors(who just graduated last year) came from Desert Mountain is inaccurate and obviously bias. Not only does it disclose names of students, but it is just inaccurate. Since nobody likes to post in the talk page, I am just going to start reverting edits. People are making weird comments and are treating this page like crap. If this keeps happening, we are going to have to do semi-protection or something. So stop doing it! Post here if you have something to add...I watch this page constantly...and I respect Wikipedia...you should too. Compguy11 05:00, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages say that you should act boldly in improving pages. However, when an change is controversial, that's when going to the talk page and talking about it is a really good idea. MessedRocker (talk) 14:19, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article Re-Do
After some thinking, MessedRocker is correct. I don't know if you should have just taken out all material, as a lot of it is accurate, but just not cited. I will work with you to re-incorporate portions of the original article with accurate citations. I am going to go ahead and put back the paragraph I wrote about construction with a valid citation and some of the sports information. Should we put info in section headings again? Compguy11 00:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- If a topic has enough information (at least two paragraphs or so), it could go in a subsection. MessedRocker (talk) 07:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
