User talk:Deletion Quality
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I have a talk page? COOL.
Contents |
[edit] Welcome!
|
[edit] User on Wikia
A user registered themselves under your username on Wikia and I would like to confirm if this is you or not. Comparing Talk:Neopets#Vandalism and the request at Wikia:requests:Kirbish I believe that this may not be you. But I need some confirmation. Dantman 05:20, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- We have a shared computer, and someone might've logged on after I fixed a typo on Wikia. I have a habit of leaving my user on because nobody uses Wiki at my household. My cousin came over the other day, so I guess they tried to request whatever Kirbish is. I did add something about the New Kirbish Rebellion on the Internet Troll section, but that was reverted. Sorry about the mix-up, though. Deletion Quality 18:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
-
- Perhaps you should invest in a whacking stick? ;-) be sure to keep your account secure ~ Anthøny 18:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Smashboards
- You have recently re-created the article Smashboards, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. JuJube 05:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, JuJube, if you check my contributions, you will see I did not recreate the page. However, I'll do the deletion review. Thanks. Deletion Quality 15:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost
[edit] Your VandalProof Application
Dear Deletion Quality,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Daniel 03:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Deletion Quality 15:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Status update request.
Hello,
Recently, you submitted a request for editor assistance regarding a deleted article. As a courtesy follow-up, I wanted to see if you had any further comments on the responses provided.
Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page at your earliest convenience. --Aarktica 15:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for replying. Good luck with the rewrite of the article. --Aarktica 15:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your WP:AIV report
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you.
Kind regards,
Anthøny 18:03, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Smashboards
It didn't survive at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smashboards --Steve (Stephen) talk 23:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- I see what you mean. Actually, that was before the current rewrite, but I don't know if that goes for all versions. Del
[edit] WP:CVU status
The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

