User talk:Danngarcia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Archive 1 (August 2006-June 2007) Archive 2 (June 2007-January 2008)

Contents 1 User:Starfm1027 2 Re: User:Gerald Gonzalez' sockpuppet 3 Jerry Codinera... 4 Why are you adding Some "Speedy Deletion Thingy" on some Articles? 5 Tagalog Wikipedia 6 reply to danngarcia 7 huh? 8 Are you really not bias? 9 Can we, like, topic-ban Gerald from editing Angel Locsin's article? 10 Image copyright problem with Image:Alaskamilkmen.png 11 Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vic &jose gma.jpg) 12 Fair use rationale for Image:Abc ipba.jpg 13 Fair use rationale for Image:Ang pagbabago gma.jpg 14 Fair use rationale for Image:AtlantikaGMA.jpg 15 Fair use rationale for Image:Bahay mo ba to gma.jpg 16 Fair use rationale for Image:Balitanghali.jpg 17 Fair use rationale for Image:Bignews abc.jpg 18 Fair use rationale for Image:Bigtimebalita.jpg 19 Fair use rationale for Image:Blazin1059.jpg

[edit] User:Starfm1027

I blocked him for 24 hours. However, User:Master of Puppets asked me to take another look since he feels you didn't attempt to work things out with him and this user has made helpful edits in the past. Can you provide any perspective on this? You were quite forceful in reverting him ... is there any back story here I should know about? Daniel Case (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

As Daniel mentioned, I just felt that you were a bit too hard on the user; when an editor does something wrong, the best course of action is to talk to them and tell them why it's wrong, not paste a template on their talk page and report them to AIV. That's just what I think, anyway. So I'd like to hear what you think. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 18:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

If you observed his recent edit, he replaced the contents of the Pasan Ko Ang Daigdig article with the contents of ABS-CBN News Channel. He also did this on the Jack TV article twice. That's why I posted warnings on his talkpage. -Danngarcia (talk) 18:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that, but you only gave them template warnings; you didn't tell them why not to do it or anything. I know that what they did was wrong, and I'm not saying it was ok, but they've made some pretty valuable contributions, so I think this block was too hasty. Proposal: I leave a message explaining to the editor not to replace article content, and they are unblocked; how does that sound? Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 22:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, if you think most of his contributions are valuable, unblock him, but you better observe his next contributions. He may disrupt this article again. -Danngarcia (talk) 03:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I'll talk to the user and tell them that replacing article content isn't right. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 04:01, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re: User:Gerald Gonzalez' sockpuppet

You might check out this user, he created another sockpuppet (User:Jollibee Happy). -Danngarcia (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for letting me know. I've blocked that sock and I've added the film he's fixating on to protected titles so it can't be recreated. I'll have to remove it eventually but I should be able to keep it there for a couple of weeks. I've also started the category Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Gerald Gonzalez‎. Please let me know if you notice anymore socks. Cheers, Sarah 23:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

P.S. You should remove these image notices! Sarah 23:37, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Jerry Codinera...

Redambergris (talk) 23:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC) Thank you for contributing, but Jerry Codinera was a UE Warrior and was a team mate of Allan Caidic on the same team, and Gary David was a Lyceum Pirates.

[edit] Why are you adding Some "Speedy Deletion Thingy" on some Articles?

just my question only.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapakachika (talk • contribs) 11:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Why adding References from Blogs is Considered SpamminG?--> kapakachika —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.84.184.46 (talk) 16:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tagalog Wikipedia

---

Finally, Wikipedia is the 7^th most visited site in the Philippines. Then why is it that the Tagalog Wikipedia, the Wikipedia in your own language remains unknown to most of the Filipinos? The mission of this campaign is to change that. Will you join us?

---

[edit] reply to danngarcia

wow. if you don't want me to make some changes to this page, then be responsible. your info is so outdated and some parts of it are not even true! you put shows that are not even shown in gma pinoy tv. you don't even have pinoy tv so how are you sure about what you are saying? at least tell the subscribers the truth about gma not having CUSTOMER SERVICE! Also tell them that your shows are 1-4 weeks delayed and it replays 1-4 times. and you call this vandalism?

p.s ask your boss about this to see if i am talking lies. if you finds out the truth, then resign!

ray, a concerned GMA PINOY TV subscriber.

as a subscriber, i think i have the right to complain. why did i chose wikipedia? thats because customer doesn't have access to the gma mgnt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.234.167.173 (talk) 09:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

above guy and Radiospeed were reported to ANI, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#sockpupeteer_makes_a_sock_after_unblock --Enric Naval (talk) 17:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

I retouched {{Laguna_Radio}} a bit to make the names conformant, and I moved a pair of radio stations to its proper name, but now the "per FM frequency" part makes no sense.... I don't know how to keep mending it, so I'll leave it like this for now. The sockpuppet has been blocked, btw, and the sockmaster is now begging again to get unblocked [1] --Enric Naval (talk) 13:16, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Reported the new sock on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#sockpupeteer_creates_yet_another_sock.2C_please_block --Enric Naval (talk) 18:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, if necessary, I'll ask to the admin that closed Pinoybandwagon's case. And if necessary, I'll open yet another sockpuppet case --Enric Naval (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I see that there is an apparently up to date list of philippine radio stations here. Is it useful for checking the articles created by Pinoybandwagon's socks? --Enric Naval (talk) 06:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

The ANI thread got archived by Misza. Can you please talk to the admins that blocked Pinoy or his socks and point them to the archived thread, and ask them to block this guy? I'm afraid I won't have time on a pair of days to do this myself. --Enric Naval (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

hello po bakit niyo po nilagyan yung article ko na suckpopet ni gerald gonzlez hindi po ako sock poppet niya baguhan lang po ako d2 sa wikipedia. Kristine Charice (talk) 09:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I saw 90.7 Love Radio, can you either move it to DZMB, or create a redirect from DZMB to 90.7 Love Radio? --Enric Naval (talk) 09:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Pinoybandwagon is back, they opened a separate sockpuppet case here for his new three accounts --Enric Naval (talk) 02:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] huh?

uhm did you send me a msg? uh sorry im not posting on that [ABC] thread or what.. o_0. maybe you got the wrong person.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.97.242.215 (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Are you really not bias?

Mike 82987 (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Hey Mr. Danngarcia... R u really not BIASED? What if somebody has edited the contents about ABS-CBN? And included there facts or acclaims about ABS-CBN that Filipinos could be proud of? And yet you are as what I have discovered and reckoned a "proud to be a Kapuso" which technically means that you could have "ALMOST" sided with GMA network ubiquitously... for good or fragrant or flourishing articles about them? Huh? Like what you and HOWARD the DUCK who are advantaged and privileged USERS of the Wikipedia particularly with Philippine-related articles, antipathize my contributions about ABS-CBN. Hence, I have included there an article about the acclaim of ABS-CBN, who was the only Philippine Media Company that included in the list of 2008's Top 10 Most Admired Company in the Philippines by the Wall street Journal Asia. And because you and Howard the duck is a chauvinist of 'Kapuso' for who specifically "SIDES" with GMA network, have deleted nor rejected my contributions about ABS-CBN's honor which GMA network doesn't get. You must be refuted for what you have been doing. Therefore, if you perceived that the article which i have inscribed doesn't make sense, but for the Filipinos like 'Kapamilya' watchers and ABS-CBN, it is not a gobbledygook.. it is momentous because of an article about honor and acclaim to any Filipino company which was reputed to that list and even to the country and our economy. If you might realize that I make sense, then so.. let me continue my contribution regarding that kind of article about ABS-CBN. Because you even let somebody or maybe 'as is' yourself, to be free on including the TV ratings from AGB Neilsen that GMA network has been getting, that could be theoretically inaccurate and confusing due to its correlative controversy, which can even be more rejected than the FACTS that I have edited about ABS-CBN. If you really are undeniably meek to follow Wikipedia's given privilege to the people which bounded with the freedom of the mass to go-and-edit "FACTS" with "REFERENCES", but why it seems at some point you are BIASED to this manner? Please dispute on this or clear yourself... and maybe give you "BENEFIT of THE DOUBT".

P.S. I am not whining on you if you are truthfully conscientious, nor I take this comments for you personally. Mike 82987 (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Can we, like, topic-ban Gerald from editing Angel Locsin's article?

Look at what he said to me at YouTube, he PM'd me about my edits:

f*** you you are *** dont let request Angel Locsin's page to be fully protected because i will kill you. **** YOU So much....your a gay...... hahaha....... uve reported me to NrDg in Wikipedia **** you..... Gay.,....

Now is this what you call a non-malicious user? Blake Gripling (talk) 12:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

I will request to fully protect both the Angel Locsin and Lobo (TV series) article. I just only hope that this request will be approved. -Danngarcia (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Alaskamilkmen.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Alaskamilkmen.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vic &jose gma.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vic &jose gma.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Abc ipba.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Abc ipba.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ang pagbabago gma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ang pagbabago gma.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AtlantikaGMA.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AtlantikaGMA.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bahay mo ba to gma.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bahay mo ba to gma.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Balitanghali.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Balitanghali.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bignews abc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bignews abc.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:53, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bigtimebalita.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigtimebalita.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Blazin1059.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blazin1059.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:41, 22 May 2008 (UTC)