Talk:Crisis (DC Comics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Necessity
Is this article really necessary? Personally, I don't see any need for an entire article on crises. Perhaps a brief mention of previous crises in the Crisis on Infinite Earths article, but do we really need this whole article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccm043 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 14 June 2007
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:FinalCrisis.jpg
Image:FinalCrisis.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 18:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] revert
User:Pharaoh of the Wizards reverted my recent edit, and when asked for an explanation replied that I "removed cited information". I did this because it was obsolete, a "teaser" and rumors(!) about something that has long since been confirmed extensively on the record. Furthermore, the bulk of my edit was uncontroversial and (I think) improved the article significantly, so I am restoring it. If anyone has specific problems with the article as it stands now, I suggest they make any changes they feel necessary to the current version rather than reverting it again. - 66.93.200.101 (talk) 12:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message IP address actually reverted your edit as you had removed cited information and had not mentioned why hence reverted the unexplained removal of information anyway no issues and I was on patrol.As you have explained it.It is no problem.Sorry if you were hurt again.Good luck and keep editing.Will not revert it now.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Now User:Brian Boru is awesome has reverted my edits, without explanation. Please try to be more constructive. - 66.93.200.101 (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

