Talk:Crimson Gem of Cyttorak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): Marvel Comics work group

Contents 1 Merging 2 Stub No Longer 3 Grammar 4 Fair use rationale for Image:ULTXANN001010 col1.JPG 5 History of the Gem

[edit] Merging

This article is really short, and doesn't have too much to say

couldn't it be merged with the juggernaut or Cyttorak articles?

[edit] Stub No Longer

Well, I have filled out this article from top to bottom with pictures, additional links and much more information. So to answer the question above, no it does not need to be merged though I will says its previous incarnation before my edits may have warranted such an action.

So as it no longer is a Stub I removed the Stub Markings. Phunbot 02:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grammar

At least the limitations section has/had horrible grammar. I tried to clean it up. Superdupergc 21:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ULTXANN001010 col1.JPG

Image:ULTXANN001010 col1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] History of the Gem

This page seems to have a lot of 8th day and Onslaught storyline material in it. This article seems to have nothing before then or after. New Excalibur #13-15 would be a good place to catch up on Gem info. As it is some of the info contradicts what has been shown. Also the page needs a lot of cleaning.TheJaff (talk) 04:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)