Talk:Colima (volcano)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Colima (volcano) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
August 11, 2005 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Volcanoes

This article is part of WikiProject Volcanoes, a project to systematically present information on volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information), or join by visiting the project page.

Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance to WikiProject Volcanoes on the project's importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.
WikiProject Mountains
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information)
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance to WikiProject Mountains on the project's importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] For an FA...

In order to move up to FA status, this article needs some touching up.

First, References! It surprised me that this article was a GA w/ only one reference! I mean come on.

Next, expansion. This article needs some facts.

Finally, Images. It would be nice to have some more images around.

Meldshal42Hit meWhat I've Done 19:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)