Talk:Cannon Air Force Base

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces (general topics):
	Military aviation task force
Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Mexico, an attempt to better organize and improve articles related to the U.S. state of New Mexico. Join us on our project talk page.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. If you rate the article please leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Anonymous comments removed

Someone apparently at Randolph Air Force Base recently added content that didn't remotely pretend to approximate Wikipedia's content standards. I have removed it. Marc W. Abel 23:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanx. My note to that individual is that if partying is your first priority, get out, the AF is not for you.--Buckboard 17:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Median incomes

Anyone know if these figures include the military allowances for housing and food? Marc W. Abel 04:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reference improvements / in-line citations called for

This article currently is labelled with "incorporates text from" an official webpage. As such, the article does not show which material is copied. Copied material should be in quotes (quotation marks or set in block quote formatting), to separate from wikipedia editor wording of consensus views, to separate from other sourced material, and to separate from new Original Research that may creep in as the article is edited over time. Hence it may be suitable to mark this article with the "refimprove" and/or "nofootnotes" tag. The latter calls for in-line citations (yes there are footnotes included in the article, but it calls for more footnoting, for the copied text)

This is not an issue of copyright violation, assuming that the source copied from is public domain. It is an issue of proper referencing, including avoiding the appearance of plagiarizing, but for other good referencing reasons as well. There are other perspectives than mine on some of these details. See Talk at WP:REF for other current discussion. doncram (talk) 18:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)