User talk:Bradeos Graphon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| ——————————————— Βραδέως Γράφων TALK PAGE ——————————————— | |
| User talk:Fire Star Archive February 2004 - September 2007 | |
| User talk:Bradeos Graphon Archive October 2007 - February 2008 |
 |
If you are here because I deleted a page you created, please first read Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted? before posting your message here. Thanks! |
[edit] Please add new messages to bottom of page
[edit] IP you recently blocked
Back to its old habits. Enigma msg! 21:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- heh, I notice you don't fill in the specific length of the block. Personal preference? Enigma msg! 23:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I made a biographical article about a student at Virginia Tech which you deleted on the grounds of relevance.Is there any branch of wikipedia where in i can create articles that are significant to a few number of people(viz.students at my college) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slipknotshukla (talk • contribs) 02:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, Thank you.Can you please help me remove the image aparkervthokie.jpeg. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slipknotshukla (talk • contribs) 02:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Bullshido
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bullshido, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshido. Thank you. Horrorshowj (talk) 22:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] RfA - Discospinster
Thank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster talk 23:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocks
I saw you indef blocked Gayboy12222. I believe he is also 118.67.222.72. They were both editing Donovan The King when you deleted it and the IP has done nothing but vandalism as well. KnightLago (talk) 02:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- And it looks like you got it shortly before this message. Thanks. KnightLago (talk) 02:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:Breathtaker
He won't quite... even after all the trouble you went through with him he still went in under a new IP and made this edit. User:east718 blocked the entire 87.122. node for a week on March 1st. Ever since the block expiered, Breathtaker has relentlessly edited every few hours ( I can provide further evidence of this if you like). Perhaps a new,longer blockon the node is in oreder.--Dr who1975 (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- still active--Dr who1975 (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Hitman047
Does this edit even make sense? JFD (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
This is hitman047 here. I apologize for editing this entry since I don't really know how to add a new message.
The reason I edited a post in Shaolin Monastery was because of the following line: " ethnic Indian peoples (who are part of the "South Asian" sub-group of the larger European race, according to anthropological genealogy"
There is no evidence to claim that Indians are a sub-group of Europeans. The so-called "Aryan invasion theory" has often been debunked and there exists no evidence for that. Until the debate of Aryan race is resolved, it would be unfair and biased to use that as a fact. Moreover, the whole thing has nothing to do with Bodhidharma or Shaolin or Kung Fu. I request you to edit that line out.
Also, shouldn't there be a "first warning" before "second warning"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitman047 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Invasion theory
Thank you for editing the article. It is much cleaner now.
As for the invasion theory goes, I have read all the available articles related to that issue on Wikipedia. I am certainly aware of the Out of India theory. The thing is, there are too many brains working on that issue, turning it into a platform for propoganda. The invasion theory follows the lines of Nazi ideology of supremacy. To believe in the invasion theory would be like justifying Nazi view of the "World Order". Nonetheless, you are free to form your opinion. Hitman047 talk
Here's something that you were probably unaware of, causing you to fall prey to the propoganda:
- Take a look at this article on Mehrgarh that talks about the modern-day archaeological evidence which dates the existence of a civilization in the subcontinent back to 7000 BC–5500 BC. It clearly mentions that "Mehrgarh is now seen as a precursor to the Indus Valley Civilization".
The so-called invasion occured around 1700BC - 1300BC, as documented in this article Indo-Aryan migration.
Having known that, does the invasion theory still make any sense to you given that archaeological evidence proves the existence of Indians in the Indus Valley BEFORE the invasion?
[edit] Please sign your contributions
When you post something or block someone [1], please sign your contribution. If you use the templates at [[WP:WARN], by clicking on the template you see a page including an automatic signature. Please keep up the good vandalsmacking efforts! Thanks. Edison (talk) 04:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Feedback
I've been working on the stub for Broadcast Journalism. I'd appreciate any feedback you have as well as any suggestions for further expansion on the article. Tmac9986 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] User:JacquesNguyen
Would you please help watch Template:History of Burma? User:JacquesNguyen changes it several times a day, accusing me of vandalism in the edit summary (I wrote the template, I am not vandalizing it, I assure you), and has never once justified his slander or changes. I see you have also had dealings with him, and would appreciate your help. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi, it seems from his contributions that User:96.229.179.106, User:69.234.176.24, and User:69.234.199.254 are also both JacquesNguyen (the former having made a great number of damaging edits); perhaps you could check it out (though I've done so already) and add them to the two other blocked IPs beginning with "9." Best, Badagnani (talk) 01:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] How did this happen?
Please see contribs for 96.229.126.4. Badagnani (talk) 23:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Please help. Badagnani (talk) 23:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Please help. Badagnani (talk) 23:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much; the editor seems knowledgeable but again and again (after block after block) returns to blanking, changing dates without sources, adding huge chunks of text copied directly from English-language books, moving pages without consensus, failing to take into consideration of the community of editors working on Vietnam-related articles, attacking other editors, evading blocks by using multiple accounts, etc. I wish he would come around to following our community norms, but it seems hopeless. Badagnani (talk) 00:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
How did the anon unblock himself? Badagnani (talk) 06:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation. I'm sorry to bother you, but somehow the editor appears to have managed to register under a new username, User:Doremon360. How was that possible? Badagnani (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
We're now having a bit of a problem. Badagnani (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
And again, same M.O. as all the previous blocked editors (or, more properly, "editor"). Badagnani (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
And again. Badagnani (talk) 20:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
It appears that JacquesNguyen has begun editing yet again, under a new username, User:Mamenchisaurus (as yet no vandalism per se, but the pattern of editing is the same). How is this possible to happen again and again if the IPs are blocked? Badagnani (talk) 03:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Proof
(Note identical closing "Thank" (without the word "you" after it):
Badagnani (talk) 03:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Delete?
I'm thinking this might be in violation of WP:NOT. Not a good Wiktionary transwiki candidate, but maybe merge in to relaxation? VanTucky 02:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- NP, I was on the fence about whether to delete or merge with that one. VanTucky 00:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Criteria
A general question that applies across all taiji styles: what are the criteria by which one judges a move to be correct? Can one always trust that there is an underlying foundation that is based on self-defence applications, the martial theory of traditional Tai Chi, together with a focus on the traditional energy concept of qi? Consider the rather precise way moves are carried out. There must be a consistent frame of reference that may be re-used over and over. Correct? --VanBurenen (talk) 20:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] NATV Native American Television
Please see the situation at NATV Native American Television, where you have contributed in the past. Badagnani (talk) 04:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] banned sockpuppet Mamenchisaurus
I have a feeling, based on shared articles, and registration dates that either of or both of the following 2 IDs may be linked with Mamenchisaurus.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Neutrino555
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jhltaka
Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:48, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Have you had an opportunity to take a look at the above? especially the Neutrino555 account?
Neutrino555 seems to have taken up the work of Mamechsaurus and the account was created just after the Mame.... account was blocked. Same article, same edits...seems pretty conclusive to me Sennen goroshi (talk) 05:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] thank spam
 |
Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky |
[edit] RS
Do you think this is spam? One editor deleted it calling it "spam" [2]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rfa thanks
Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!--Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 04:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] I bring to your attention
Guang Ping Yang Tai Chi Chuan and Kuo Lien Ying. I've proposed the deletion of the style page, as neither of Kuo's two published books are guides to his supposed style (it's really just a slight variation on Yang, not a distinct style). The guy did publish a couple book still in circulation though, so I think it's fair to say the bio meets WP:V. VanTucky 00:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Subpage code
Hi, can you move your user/user talk subpages (and those of User:Fire Star) to include the forward slash ("/"), for instance User talk:Fire Star/Archive 1? Recently, many such pages have been deleted. Just a heads-up. Regards, --RFBailey (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks - Nossa Senhora
Missed the vandalism there. Thanks for correcting! joshschr (Talk | contribs) 19:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you from Horologium
 |
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed unanimously with the support of 100 editors. Your kindness is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Wizardman, Black Falcon and jc37 for nominating me. — Horologium |
[edit] Thank you for the barnstar
So great to get those. Didn't know you were watching (-: ——Martinphi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 02:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Seconded - it is nice when everything works out for the best. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 06:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] New tai chi pictures
This year at RecentChangesCamp I had a Wikimedia Commons nut take some pictures of me doing the 24 form. Some of them are total crap because I didn't warm up at all and my elbow/shoulders aren't relaxed properly, but a few might be useful. You can find it at Category:Tai Chi Chuan Demo. I've tried to go through and name all the postures on the image description page, let me know if I missed any or they are confusing. VanTucky 18:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Expansion
Message in xiuzhen, comments?ACHKC (talk) 04:09, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Any comments to the Revised Intro for Taoism? 202.82.204.157 (talk) 09:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tsangpa Gyare - neutrality
I now added a leader which explains some of the mystical aspects of Tibetan biographies. Do you think this enough. Also been "wikify-ing" the article. Have I passed an accesptable standard yet? GavinErickson (talk) 23:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion review for Template:Bbblock
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:Bbblock. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — xaosflux Talk 11:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- The DRV closed as a restore without prejudice for relisting, and this as now been relisted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_June_5. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 04:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The userpage guy
Thanks for blocking him, that was painful to watch. Did he have a script or something to do that? Darkspots (talk) 01:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
