Talk:Beak (comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): Marvel Comics work group

Contents 1 Exiles 2 Exiles, Part 2 3 NPOV 4 Fair use rationale for Image:Newxmen125.jpg

[edit] Exiles

The info under the illustration claims Beak to be still a member of the Exiles. I don't know if that is correct. Luis Dantas 12:21, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Exiles, Part 2

I thought the Exiles were reality-hoppers, not time-travellers. Mishy dishy 23:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Yep. Even when they've gone to events that were considered to be in the past (Death of Phoenix, for example), it was explained that the timeline was just going a bit slower. I switched it over to reality hopping. Deafgeek 11:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

There's a lot of things in here that need cleaning up. Two examples that come to mind are "Scarlet Witch's crazy" and the discussion of the legitamacy of his name. I'm hoping to do some work on this later myself, when I'm not stuck at work. Deafgeek 15:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Newxmen125.jpg

Image:Newxmen125.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)