User talk:Bashereyre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Martin-Snape.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Martin-Snape.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Snape pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Snape pic.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ms_w27_th.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ms_w27_th.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Jack McGurk

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Bashereyre! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Looking north P1010016.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Looking north P1010016.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:08, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Williams- Guide P1010001.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Williams- Guide P1010001.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:DrWvL P1010043.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DrWvL P1010043.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Bank_Robber_Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bank_Robber_Cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Perfect5s.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Perfect5s.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mcvities Lincoln Biscuits 200g.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Mcvities Lincoln Biscuits 200g.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. —Pilotguy cleared for takeoff 23:43, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Sloan and Crosby

Please see the Wikipedia style guidelines for writing about fiction, as well as the neutral point of view policy and the words to avoid guideline. These may help you write about in a fiction in a style that is more encyclopedic and less like a review. Thank you. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 12:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bank_Robber_Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bank_Robber_Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:DrVonL_P1010043.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:DrVonL_P1010043.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jim_Starling_and_the_Colonel_P1010020.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jim_Starling_and_the_Colonel_P1010020.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Strange,M_(1953)_P1010001.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Strange,M_(1953)_P1010001.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bidbury_Juniors_P1010006.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bidbury_Juniors_P1010006.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Bidbury_Infants_P1010007.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bidbury_Infants_P1010007.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SnapeM_Hillhead_P1010001.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SnapeM_Hillhead_P1010001.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Manor_at_Wymering_P1010076.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Manor_at_Wymering_P1010076.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Semi DET P1010009.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Semi DET P1010009.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Wikipedians interested in Dad's Army, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. John254 20:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jennings-Goes-to-School.jpg

Hello, Bashereyre. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Jennings-Goes-to-School.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bashereyre. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 10:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Motorhead.jpg

Hello, Bashereyre. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Motorhead.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bashereyre. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Dadsarmy 1.jpg

Hello Bashereyre, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Dadsarmy 1.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Bashereyre. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Please note that it is possible that the image on your page is included vie a template or usebox. In that case, please find a free image for the template or userbox. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 11:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bedhampton Social Hall

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Bedhampton Social Hall, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MisterHand 00:42, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] John Trunley

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page John Trunley. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. MrClaxson 19:40, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] News

Just to let you know, there is now a Wikipedia:WikiProject Motörhead.--Alf melmac 18:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:AvoncliffRSP1010087.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:AvoncliffRSP1010087.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:B O A Stn P1010179.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:B O A Stn P1010179.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:05, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Dundas Aquaduct P1010050.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Dundas Aquaduct P1010050.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:AvoncliffRSP1010087.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:AvoncliffRSP1010087.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. bluemask (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:B_O_A_Stn_P1010179.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:B_O_A_Stn_P1010179.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. bluemask (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:AvoncliffRwStnP1010087.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:AvoncliffRSP1010087.JPG. The copy called Image:AvoncliffRSP1010087.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] West Wittering, West Sussex

A tag has been placed on West Wittering, West Sussex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AllynJ 09:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Great Randini

The article The Great Randini has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 12:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:P1010002HvSTiv.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:P1010002HvSTiv.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:P1077LNPtwrdsSS.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:P1077LNPtwrdsSS.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:P1077LNPtwrdsSmS.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:P1077LNPtwrdsSS.JPG. The copy called Image:P1077LNPtwrdsSS.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Notability of Country Gentleman's Association

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Country Gentleman's Association, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Country Gentleman's Association seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Country Gentleman's Association, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:00, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CGAi P1010334.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CGAi P1010334.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CGAii P1010333.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CGAii P1010333.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CGAiii P1010332.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CGAiii P1010332.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:CGAiv P1010331.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CGAiv P1010331.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:EWD JS P1010006.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:EWD JS P1010006.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:28, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:262329 8c311dac Whtfld.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:262329 8c311dac Whtfld.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:262329 8c311dac Whtfldi.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:262329 8c311dac Whtfld.jpg. The copy called Image:262329 8c311dac Whtfld.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IOW Raiwlay stions

Just a quick note to say nice work with the IOW railway stions ;) Pickle 21:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Update - well done on the yet more great work! Pickle 00:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:P10HslmStn80.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:P10HslmStn80.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:P1GldmgSt074.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:P1GldmgSt074.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:P1GldmgSt074i.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:P1GldmgSt074.JPG. The copy called Image:P1GldmgSt074.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inadvertant rolback

Hi, sorry about my rollback during your edit on Woolston railway station... I've been vandalism chasing and got carried away when I saw the gallery outline. Please accept my apologies. Geoff Riley 18:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Henry Agar-Ellis, 3rd Viscount Clifden

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Henry Agar-Ellis, 3rd Viscount Clifden, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://thepeerage.com/p5450.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 07:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Owners of Epsom Derby winners

Thanks for starting this category. I've moved it to be a subsidiary of British racehorse owners and breeders rather than horses. However, as a thought, I think this might be better as a Category called "Owners of British Classic Race winners". The list of Epsom Derby winners forms a list of owners in any case, so a combined category for all British Classic-winning owners would make sense. What do you think? Bcp67 20:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to St Mary le Bow

You rectified a glaring omission: until now there was no mention of the Church's ministry! I have made a new section for this and changed one of the references you supplied to the online edition, where more people can read it. All the best. --Old Moonraker 17:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Emboldening references: don't

I notice you've got the habit of emboldening references. It is IMO not a good thing, and AFAIK not supported by policy, which would instead have you italicise book titles... see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles). I'd be grateful if you'd consider amending, especially, all of the church articles which suffer from emboldening. --Tagishsimon (talk) 08:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Yup. The initialism were as you deduced. Though clearly with these things there's a danger that YMMV :) --Tagishsimon (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Interfering with CFD for "Great Fire of London Churches" categories

Please do not edit categories while they are being discussed at CFD. You inappropriately removed CFD templates and inappropriately emptied categories in favour of new categories, which were the proposed names at the CFD. This has the potential to cause serious strife and confusion, so please don't do it again in the future. Snocrates 08:52, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JSATC P1010020.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:JSATC P1010020.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MCGURK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MCGURK.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:SwRS100287.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:SwRS100287.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 19:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to WikiProject Trains

Hello and welcome to the Trains WikiProject! Thank you for adding your name to our project membership list. Our goal is to build the most comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. As a project member, you may add the project membership userbox to your user page if you wish.

If you haven't done so already, please add our main project page to your watchlist and take some time to review the Trains project manual of style where we have collected guidelines and suggestions on notability and style for a consistent representation of rail transport related material. If you're curious about where to start, we've gathered a few suggestions in the Trains project to do list. If you'd like to specialize in a particular area of study within rail transport, take a look at the current Trains project task forces.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the project talk page or on my talk page. Again, welcome and happy editing! Slambo (Speak) 17:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:487960 bb506b84 213x160HAWILL.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:487960 bb506b84 213x160HAWILL.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 23:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:4879600HAWILL.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:487960 bb506b84 213x160HAWILL.jpg. The copy called Image:487960 bb506b84 213x160HAWILL.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 23:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:067597 daeb9713 213x160EHLR.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:067597 daeb9713 213x160EHLR.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:067597 daeb9713 0EHLR.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:067597 daeb9713 213x160EHLR.jpg. The copy called Image:067597 daeb9713 213x160EHLR.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pointless P1010005.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Pointless P1010005.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anglicanism portal link

Hi Bashereye, can you be careful when adding portal links in quick succession not to mess-up the formatting of the page, please? The convention is normally to place these portal links in the external links sections alongside the Commons links or something, as it's rather distracting otherwise and often spoils infobox/photograph alignment. Alternately, rather than having to go through all articles on a certain theme, i.e. Anglican Cathedrals, you could add a link to the related template, i.e. template:Anglican Cathedrals in the United Kingdom perhaps. Thanks. Bob talk 16:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

IMHO, I second that. The article takes precedence, and while I wouldn't eliminate it, external links seems an appropriate place. We've just had some London pages adopted by up to six projects - I wouldn't like to see a frieze of portal templates on the article page too. In this case you could add it once, to {{London churches}} Thanks. Kbthompson (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User Category for Discussion

A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies. This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page.
VegaDark (talk) 01:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of R.A.M.O.N.E.S.

A tag has been placed on R.A.M.O.N.E.S. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phoenix-wiki talk · contribs 23:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jane and Prudence.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jane and Prudence.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:People namechecked in Ramones songs

I have nominated Category:People namechecked in Ramones songs (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 22:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Mark Delaney (boxer)

A tag has been placed on Mark Delaney (boxer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kannie | talk 22:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mike Smitt

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Mike Smitt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:027161 b031e7bePS.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:027161 b031e7bePS.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bishop of Tewkesbury

Can you have alook at the article you created as above, something is very wrong. I at first thought that it was misnamed as you have it as Horsham in your creation note, but the Bishop of Horsham is an existing article? Thanks Paste (talk) 22:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] {{UK-suffragan bishop-stub}}

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:4879600HAWILL.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:4879600HAWILL.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. B (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ramones around the world.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ramones around the world.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Albert Road Halt

Hi, I graded this article, and cleaned it up a bit afterwards. If quoting a book in a reference, you can use the cite book template - {{cite book | first = | last = | authorlink = | coauthors = | year = | month = | title = | chapter = | editor = | others = | edition = | pages = | publisher = | location = | id = ISBN | url = }}. Just a couple of questions:- You say that the LSWR & LBSCR ran the line in alternate years - do you have a reference for that? Also, the Southern Railway Halts, Survey and Gazetteer gives the name as Albert Road Bridge Halt, the other halt on the line also has Bridge in its title. Mjroots (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images and Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!

Andreworkney (talk) 20:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Anglican bishops

Hello. I'm very impressed with these articles you've been creating on Anglican bishops. They are really good and much needed.

I'm just a bit perplexed about some stylistic things, especially your use of italics. In Cyril Eastaugh, for example, you place 'Vice-Principal' and 'St John the Divine Kennington' in italics; likewise 'St Helen's Parish Church', 'St Michael's-in-the-Hamlet', and 'St John's' in Herbert Gresford Jones. In Michael Henshall we have, 'the Episcopate of Warrington'. I am not sure why John Yates (bishop) was educated at Battersea Grammar School in italics but Jesus College, Cambridge in Roman. Is there a reason for this?

A more serious point is that in a couple I have changed references to being a "full bishop" to "diocesan bishop". When a bishop is consecrated, whether as an archbishop, diocesan, suffragan, coadjutor, or any other kind of bishop, he (or in some Churches she) becomes a full bishop. On translation from a suffragan see to a diocesan see a bishop acquires greater administrative powers and in England the right, either by virtue of holding a particular see or when a vacancy occurs, of sitting in the House of Lords, but there is no further ordination or consecration. A suffragan bishop is, for example, just as capable as a diocesan bishop in the ordination of priests and deacons. So I think you might want to steer clear of the term "full bishop" or "full episcopate" in the future. Many people make a similar mistake with ordination to the priesthood, saying something like, 'He was ordained deacon at Petertide 1980 and became a full priest at the same time next year', suggesting that a deacon is half a priest rather than an order of ministry in its own right (not that this is a mistake you have made). I suppose what I am saying is that the episcopate is an order of ministry and should not be confused with the offices held by different persons within that order.

As in Timothy John Bavin, which I have changed, along with some other errors with dates (assuming my Crockford is accurate), you refer several times to somebody having taken Holy Orders at a theological college rather as though he were a solicitor taking articles. I think it would be better to say that somebody studied for ordination at theological college and took Holy Orders at the ordination service, which usually does not take place in the college, though of course it could.

But apart from these little quibbles, I think the articles are brilliant and I'm quite astonished that you seem to have all the newspapers to hand, even to the point of stating the exact column in which the original article appeared!--Oxonian2006 (talk) 02:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I also echo the thanks - could you possibly mark the talk pages with {{anglicanismproject}} as you create them as this will help encourage a wider audience to keep an eye on them, and improve the articles. Indeed, come and join us at WP:Anglicanism. David Underdown (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

I am a big Ramones fan, too. Welcome to the Anglicanism project. -- Secisek (talk) 13:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

May I echo Oxonian2006's comment's above: well done.

I think you deserve one of these too:

Updated DYK query On 19 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kenneth John Woollcombe, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- One pound (talk) 20:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Lewis (bishop)

Hello again. I hope I have done the right thing with Michael Lewis (bishop). He was previously under Michael Owen (bishop). However, in Crockford and Who's Who as well as on the diocesan website it gives his name as Michael Lewis. I just thought I should let you know as it's quite a big change!--Oxonian2006 (talk) 19:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Archbishops

My understanding is that your ex-colleague and the Desmond Tutu article are both right. Generally speaking there is no such thing as an archbishop emeritus. A while back it was quite usual for clerics to die in office so there was no need for such a title. Then emeritus titles gradually came in: archdeacon emeritus is a fairly new thing and I think it was canons of Carlisle Cathedral that less than ten years ago couldn't technically become emeritus, though the bishop said they could unofficially use the title Canon (I think the position has been regularised now with a change to the cathedral statutes). However, archbishops do generally revert to the style and title of a bishop, i.e. The Right Revd and 'Bishop'/'My Lord'. In England they generally get peerages, which kind of compensates. Other provinces of the Anglican Communion can do whatever they like, as far as I know. In the case of Desmond Tutu I've always heard him called archbishop emeritus. It's not in his Crockford entry because no emeritus appointments are, but my 2002/03 edition still has him as The Most Reverend. I don't know whether he is unique or if all South African archbishops are now going to become emeritus. But your colleague was right. If you should meet George Carey or David Hope, call them Bishop.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Puzzling deletion

Hello Basheryere. When I deleted St George Hanover Square it wasn't an article per se, it was a redirect to the article which had been moved to St George's Church, Mayfair. It was tagged for deletion as an "unlikely typo"; the editor who had tagged it apparently felt that there might be several churches by that name and did not want the article to reflect only the one in Mayfair.

The title has since been recreated and the article was moved back. The article itself was never gone, it was just under a different name. I hope this explains what happened. Regards, ... discospinster talk 02:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

My apologies for the delay in getting back to you. I trust this has all been sorted out? -- One pound (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
St George's, Hanover Square has been recreated as another redirect for good measure (it had previously been deleted, although I still don't see why...) BencherliteTalk 22:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pointless P1010005.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pointless P1010005.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Sportspeople who have served prison sentences

Category:Sportspeople who have served prison sentences, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory (talk) 11:31, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Category:RAF Wartime Service

There's already a category category:Royal Air Force personnel of World War II (and a similar one for WWI), so I've moved Yates into that, I suggest you put the new category up for deletion as the creator since it is redundant. David Underdown (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Better, but I think a more specific name is required - I would rather suspect that some RAFVR personnel served in the Korean War, so sticking with the existing naming conventions (which I understand are used across all services and nations) to have RAFVR personnel of World War II might be better still. David Underdown (talk) 12:13, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Santer

This is a noce stub, which I cleaned up a tad. If you ever see one of my articles, please feel free to copy edit. Bearian (talk) 16:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Meet-ups

Hey! You took some pics at the meetup, right? Are you going to upload them? Thanks, Majorly (talk) 18:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Good to meet you Bashereyre. ...Yeah more photos are always good. And get yourself signed up for Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Sunday Lunctime again. May 11th! -- Harry Wood (talk) 15:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BoM

We have just deleted a bill of mortality article. The content was:

“ in 1603 a plage had killed 40 000 peole in 1609.12 000 in 1625 35000 and in 1636 10 000.this time it would kill even more.the plage was about to claim over 100 000 Samuel Pepys, FRS (23 February 1633 – 26 May 1703) was an English naval administrator and Member of Parliament, who is now most famous for his diary. Although Pepys had no maritime experience, he rose by patronage, hard work and his talent for administration to be the Chief Secretary to the Admiralty under King James II. His influence and reforms at the Admiralty were important in the early professionalization of the Royal Navy.[1]

The detailed private diary that he kept during 1660–1669 was first published in the nineteenth century, and is one of the most important primary sources for the English Restoration period. It provides a combination of personal revelation and eyewitness accounts of great events, such as the Great Plague of London, the Second Dutch War and the Great Fire of London.

His surname is usually pronounced /ˈpiːps/ (same as the English word peeps), although at the time it could have been pronounced either "peeps", "peps", or "peppis".

 ”

Could you provide a sensible article sometime, please? -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:22, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:P12600ARH.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Hi Bashereyre!
We thank you for uploading Image:P12600ARH.JPG, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dumpford

I cleaned up the infobox and fixed your references, just to let you know. I think I may have gone over one of your edits when there was a conflict - just to let you know. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 18:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Rosesofeyam2.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rosesofeyam2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sunday Lunchtime Meetup

Can I interest you in Wikipedia:Meetup/London 10. Same place. This Sunday 1p.m.! -- Harry Wood (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Suffragan bishops

Nice to see you have an interest in editing the Anglican bishops. I'm going through the anglican suffragan bishops, and when I came to Bishop of Maidstone I noticed you edited the article today (7 June 2008). I've made a few further edits to the article. I hope I'm not stepping in your toes. Scrivener-uki (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I don’t know of any books covering suffragan bishops in detail. In fact I don't know of any at all. I’d suggest look for books on diocesan bishops, since they are more likely to be in existence. Since some diocesan bishops had been suffragan bishops their suffragan role may be mentioned. Scrivener-uki (talk) 14:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Anglican bishops of Christchurch,NZ

Category:Anglican bishops of Christchurch,NZ, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)