Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegeta Vs. Recoome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 07:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vegeta Vs. Recoome

Vegeta Vs. Recoome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Unnotable, probably even within the Dragon Ball Z article. αѕєηιηє t/c 06:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete This is an out of context plot element from a single episode or movie.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 06:44, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Quite Notable. -- Pacifif Adventurer (talk) 06:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, per TorchWoodwho. hateless 10:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Not notable, no references, not well written, and ALL information thaat could possibly be given to the article could be foudn within another article about the show or an episode. --Bigvinu (talk) 14:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Let's go easy here. This is the first article the author (who's commented here) has written, and it was tagged six minutes after creation. Still, it does not meet the notability guideline, and I think its safe to say it never will. Xymmax (talk) 16:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - extremely minor plot event. Not notable. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 18:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - There are thousands of fights in dragon ball. Creating an article for each one is not necessary--Tintor2 (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: I'm not finding any reliable sources to suggest that this, of all the fights in the series, is particularly notable. No redirect, as this isn't a plausible search term and more than one possible target. The editor is encouraged to improve existing articles with relevant information, and if any of that work warrants spinning out, that can be done afterwards. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Completely non-notable. Fails WP:FICTION. --Farix (Talk) 21:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Oh wow, good find. (jarbarf) (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.