Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tressym

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tressym

Tressym (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Dungeons & Dragons creature which does appear in a number of books, but is not particuarly significant. No evidence of third party sources. J Milburn (talk) 13:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and/or Redirect into Faerun. BOZ (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge and/or Redirect into Faerun. Web Warlock (talk) 17:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Not every D&D creature is notable. Very few are, actually. This is no slaad or death knight, so away it goes. (I'm going to copy-paste this into all of the D&D creature AfD's going on right now. Couldn't we have combined them for ease?) --Ig8887 (talk) 03:57, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable winged housecat. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable stock character with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside D&D canon. --Gavin Collins (talk) 12:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Yup it is practically a copy of all of those thousands of other winged housecats you see everywhere. I know *I* am tired of seeing them. Web Warlock (talk) 12:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I swat them with brooms, but they just fly to a different room. So hard to get rid of. BOZ (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep taking the meds, and they will soon go away :p --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete — non-notable. D&D monsters/creatures are not all stock characters as some may want you to think they are, and thus has no bearing on this article. its lack of outside sources and being obscure even within the game to the point where those outside the game would have no idea what a Tressym is if they heard or saw the name however does. just a creature created for the game, and as previously said all D&D monsters/creatures are not notable inherently because D&D itself is notable. shadzar-talk 20:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.