User talk:Webwarlock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 Archives |
| /Archive 1 /Archive 2 |
This is my talk page.
And I am on break.
 |
Web Warlock is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia when I feel like it, unless the Deletionists have gotten rid everything. |
Contents |
[edit] Deletionists
I hear ya - don't let 'em get you down. Hopefully one day they will all realize the futility of their goal and they'll all give up. Or maybe Wikipedia as a whole will embrace them, and people like us can stop wasting their time here. Either way, you can always hope for the future. ;) Take it easy, and hope to see you back soon. :) BOZ (talk) 13:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- No worries. I'll be back around June I am sure. Web Warlock (talk) 14:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Please reconsider your attitude towards other editors
I am not sure that your attitude towards other editors who do not share your point of view is not appropriate. What sort of a statement is this? I have been used to being brushed off by you on a regular basis, as I can understand that we have had many disagreements, but now you are dismissing the observations and suggestions of other editors as well, I must bring this to your attention after your comments at Talk:Githyanki. As an educationalist, you must receive respect and courtesy for intellectual contributions all the time, even from people who do not agree with your viewpoint. Please consider responding to other editors with opinions different from your own in the same way as you would have them respond to you. I would be grateful if you would set a better example for others to follow.--Gavin Collins (talk) 09:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- eyebrow* Gavin, please don't be condescending. Webwarlock doesn't have a rather massive RfC regarding his editing behavior like yourself nor -frequent- complaints of incivility and hostility towards editors with a different editing viewpoint. And I'm still waiting for an apology over your false statements about me on the talk page for the Githyanki.Shemeska (talk) 11:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sigh...
I hate to keep on asking you these kinds of things, but you're one of the few people that I know who has lots of references. The best way to deal with the hoo-hah about Generic role-playing game systems is to cite where it was used, e.g. is there some Dragon or White Dwarf (or whatever) that utilizes this terminology in regards to role-playing game systems? (Like maybe they're comparing GURPS and BRP, for example, and talking about generic systems as a class of RPG systems. I think that you put in most of the refs for BRP, so maybe they use "generic" in those White Dwarf reviews.) Hope you're enjoying your break, and that I'm not intruding upon it. --Craw-daddy | T | 12:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ask a way! I was reading some stuff on the train today. So yes I will, and want to, do it! Web Warlock (talk) 21:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- I added something but it probably needs wordsmithed a bit. I have more to add. Web Warlock (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Mediation
I would like to keep the case from taking on too many participants, especially in an instance like this one where there are clear lines of opinion and a large number of people involved in the broader discussion. Is there someone already party to the case that you feel represents your interests? Vassyana (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- No worries. I was thinking I would serve this better as a observer anyway. I am sure my concerns will be addressed, they are shared by the majority. And plus I feel the editor in question's behavior is such that my input won't really be needed. But thank you for coming by my talk page to let me know! Web Warlock (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
