Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Glutton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Glutton

The Glutton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Very minor D&D deity introduced in a minor source book. No evidence of third party coverage, and it didn't even get much first party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Merge where appropriate with the D&D Gnome article and Greyhawk gods article. Web Warlock (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - non notable. shadzar|Talk|contribs 18:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Better to mention such, ah, gnomish deities in a list (sans-link). Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Feed it to a Snorlax or Yoshi. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L10 Lucario Cleric of Mew)} 22:01, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

  or Kirsty Alley. Jack Merridew 08:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

  CofS wouldn't let her close enough ;) -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L7 Kacheek Defier)} 08:46, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

  I learn something here everyday. Cheers, Jack Merridew 10:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.