Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protect the Prime Minister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 03:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Protect the Prime Minister

Protect the Prime Minister (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability (WP:N), no independent references (WP:V). I think with game mod articles these should be shown as soon as possible, since there are so many unnotable mods out there. Prod was removed by an anonymous user without addressing these concerns. Marašmusïne_Talk 09:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marašmusïne_Talk 09:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into the GTA:SA:MP article. WP is not a game guide. Corpx 20:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom--Sefringle^Talk 05:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)\
• Delete for reasons stated by the nominator. I don't think mods deserve their own article unless they are widely well known like DOTA (which is also up for deletion). Mrmoocow 06:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• The mod has an article, but this is just a game mode in the mod. Corpx 16:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Makes it even less notable then, doesn't it? Mrmoocow 20:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, already noted and explained in the SA:MP article. Fin©™ 22:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete mention in relevant article (GTA:SA), not here Giggy _U^CP 23:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.