Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playford family
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The result was Keep--JForget 00:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Playford family
Playford family is a very short list of members of the family that fails purpose of lists. The information already is available in the underlying biography articles, including the family connections. The underlying biography articles are sufficient for navigation purposes and the list is very short and not needed for development. -- Jreferee t/c 19:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. —Orderinchaos 22:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep How many does it take to be important as a family--this list has 5 people, 2 of them Premiers of South Australia. I think that is sufficient. (I think we have no formal standard) . DGG (talk) 00:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep per above for both this and Downer family. EDIT: See Category:Political families of Australia, more have been tagged for deletion, yet entries in Category:Political families of the United States are fine. Timeshift 02:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It is not a list, but an article about a political family, with plenty more to be added. Influential Pastors, councillors, Senators and Premiers? Surely enough for an article. Michael talk 02:40, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, notable family. John Vandenberg 07:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, notable family. --Roisterer 09:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Never heard of them, but they're the Kennedys from down under. Tiptopper 13:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep sufficiently many members are notable. JJL 22:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep AfD Cruft Twenty Years 13:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

