Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Smeaton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.-Wafulz (talk) 19:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Matthew Smeaton

Matthew Smeaton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Some ghits, many false positives, no evidence of RS coverage. He may exist, but no evidence he's notable. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 19:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete: not notable enough, and also no references, speedy delete. Dwilso 19:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:34, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. [1] gives a fair amount of information about him, but no indication that he's sufficiently notable.-gadfium 23:19, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.