Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenmore Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. I'll do my best to merge selectively; others will have to improve on my efforts if they want to. Mangojuice^talk 18:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kenmore Middle School

Kenmore Middle School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE. Long, drawn out article about a middle school with not 1 ounce of notability. Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy 17:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy 17:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - Lacks references and would probably be better merged into a school district article. However, the article is beyond that of a stub and could become a good article with a cleanup and expansion of existing sections. Camaron1 | Chris 18:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to its respective district. There is little to suggest that this school is signifcantly different from most other middle schools. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 19:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to respective school district. —Ocatecir ^Talk 20:22, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per Mr.Z-man above. It's better developed than some of the school pages I've seen here in AfD, but the content seems to be something more tuned to a website than Wikipedia. (note, edit conflict.) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge anything that is properly attributed to the district article, deleting the WP:OR, and leave a redirect. --Butseriouslyfolks 21:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep most school articles should be written this well and have this much information in them. There is too much good information here to merge.Noroton 23:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to district It is well written, and it has a good deal of information that shows the school to be very similar to other schools, without any particularly notable characteristic. DGG 03:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge to district, and prune heavily in the process. We judge articles by their content, not by weight length, and the content here fails to demonstrate any particular notability. Much of the content, in fact, borders on trivia. Xtifr _tälk 02:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per [1] - passing WP:NOTE. Part Deux 15:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment Your school in those google news articles are about a school in buffalo. just fyi. and I'd go with merge to the district.Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy 20:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment I would also support a merge. Camaron1 | Chris 16:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• Merge to district article. Vegaswikian 08:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I tried looking for any notability in this school to push it towards notability, but I can't find anything that stands out.--Wizardman 02:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete or (second option) Merge to district article. Garion96 (talk) 11:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per WP:LOCAL while retaining edit history for GFDL purposes. RFerreira 02:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:LOCAL.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 03:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge per RFerreira, etc. --Myles Long 14:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Noroton. This is well-written. - grubber 18:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.