Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jolanta Bledaite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, with no disrespect intended. Nandesuka (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Jolanta Bledaite
May not meet WP:N or WP:BIO1E. Murdered woman, but being murdered alone simply isn't notable, even if media coverage makes it appear notable briefly.--No More Tears, Baby (talk) 18:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC) No More Tears, Baby (talk) 18:53, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Article has no quality, or importance. DeadmanUndertaker 18:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable. Possible copyvio.—G716 <T·C> 19:52, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable even if there were crime reports on BBC. Renata (talk) 20:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - as they are only notable for one event - their death AngelOfSadness talk 21:05, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete I was thinking just this morning how this case has now disappeared entirely from the news. Major coverage at the time of the discovery of the body parts, but the murder investigation seems pretty open-and-shut and not particularly significant in itself. Ms Bledaite is not a notable person either. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. —Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:00, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
