Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Beans And Almonds

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gob (band). Fabrictramp (talk) 15:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Green Beans And Almonds

Green Beans And Almonds (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Per WP:Music: All articles on albums or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines. Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 04:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Strong KeepIt's an Album by a notable enough band. It wasn't covered that greatly since it was one of there early ones, but i think it needs a wikipedia article because a google search gives alot of random interviews about it from the band, and an article is needed since it is an actual album, not a demo. [LukeTheSpook] | [t c r] 04:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
don't make me go through This Again. [LukeTheSpook] | [t c r] 04:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge/Redirect - according to WP:MUSIC, all albums and songs - and therefore by implication singles - still have to meet basic WP:N criteria. It even states that "album articles with little more than a track listing may more appropriately merged....". I can't see anything in the article justifying notability for an article in its own right, so my vote is to merge it into the groups' article, and change this article to a redirect. Since, the Page_44 debate related to the notability of a group, rather than a single, I don't think it's the same issue. CultureDrone (talk) 09:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment Yes, but the whole point of me stating that was, i created the article for Page 44 and i practically fought to have it not deleted, it had been deleted 2 times before. Also, Legotech seems to be abusing his editing privlidges by adding multiple AFds to all GOB-Related articles. [The Spooky One] | [t c r] 04:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect - Non-notable per WP:MUSIC - Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment if the consesus is delete or Redirect, can the article instead be merged into Gob (band)[LukeTheSpook] | [t c r] 18:48, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment - "Delete" in this case would mean we thought the EP did not exist. It looks like a redirect to Gob (band), to me. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Gob (band) - limited edition EP doesn't quite make it to the notability bar; so the redirect to the band's article is the proper action. B.Wind (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.