Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frueh's Flowers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 20:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Frueh's Flowers

Frueh's Flowers (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A small company article posted by the son of the owners in violation of WP:COI (see the article's talk page). I originally tagged this with {{db-bio}}, but another user felt that the age of the company constituted an implicit assertion of notability. I find two Google hits to local Saginaw, MI flower directories[1]. No reliable sources substantiating any notability or providing any basis under which this would meet WP:CORP.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

db-bio removal reason from discussion: I am buildign this site as a page for my parent's family business, however due to limited time in class to work on it, and further research, I won't be able to put all of the information up right away. However, i do intend on makign this a fully functional page, so please bear with me. Thank you.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamphunter1462 (talk • contribs)

I understand it is hard but wiki is not a webhosting. You must provide some reason for keep this article. Tulkolahten 21:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete WP:CSD#G11 and WP:NOT a business directory. Leuko 00:47, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment I'd hardly call the article blatant advertising. I'm the editor that felt the article didn't meet A7, and I don't think it warrants a G11 speedy deletion either. I'd just like for some sources to be turned up before the article is deleted; running an AfD increases those chances a hell of a lot more than slapping a db tag on it. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I agree, there is too few sources. Tulkolahten 21:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, nothing happened. Tulkolahten 21:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.