Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flumen solum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Flumen solum

Flumen solum (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Delete as fictional element in unreleased book. Google search shows 4 results, two of them here. Prod tag removed. ... discospinster _talk 20:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - fictional items from an unpublished book cannot possibly be notable. JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - encyclopaedic and not notable. Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 21:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:CRYSTAL, WP:FICTION/WP:WAF, and what JohnCD said. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete for all the above reasons. Can't find any evidence the unpublished book is notable, let alone a fictional place in it.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable yet. --Starionwolf (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 15:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails too many tests to list here, could always be recreated after the book (or television special) is published. - Dravecky (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete simply per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:FICTION - Milks F'avorite Cookie 22:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.