Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exit (2009)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE Toddst1 (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Exit (2009)
Delete - Yet-unreleased film of unclear notability. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 03:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Quick Delete - no one can deny the greatness of Johno Faherty's film that hasen't yet started filming, or can they? --Lemmey talk 03:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Unreleased movie, zero Ghits (aside from Wikipedia) on the producer Johno Faherty (which would be pretty much impossible if the movie was notable), probable Conflict of Interest with the author (judging from the username and the apparent single-purpose nature), no sources (let alone reliable ones), no notability. nneonneo talk 03:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete. To quote WP:MOVIE, "Films which have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced shooting should not have their own articles," and this one definitely hasn't. (I'm not convinced it'll be notable even after release, but that takes me into crystal ball territory.) AnturiaethwrTalk 04:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of being a wide-release film, looks like a student film at best, with no independent coverage, there is no external sources to use to write an article from. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Titanium Dragon (talk) 06:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 08:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete it's clearly not notable at this time. If at some later date (you know afer it's actualy done and released for starters) becomes a major cult clasic or something it can be revisited at that time. Delte the movie poster image too while at it by the way. --Sherool (talk) 10:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. Crystal ballism regarding something that wouldn't be notable even if it had already happened. Article indicates the film is in post-production yet filming is not scheduled to even begin for another month. This looks like something made up one day; at best a student film in the making, at worst a hoax. OlenWhitaker • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 19:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Note: A little digging confirms what I suspected. The author of this article is User:Johnofah5 who essentially admits in this diff to being the same Johno Faherty as is referred to as the supposed producer of this film and the goes on in this diff to admit to being a middle school student. As I suspected: something made up in school one day. OlenWhitaker • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 19:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable film. — scetoaux (T|C) 22:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete nn at this time. JJL (talk) 23:53, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete This is an advertisement for a non-notable film. In fact, I'd call it spam. 24.6.157.14 (talk) 21:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as the film fails to be notable, and the primary contributor appears to have a conflict of interest in creating this topic. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
