Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Nevill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dan Nevill
The article claims that this young actor is a co-star in a popular television show, but the article does not include any reliable sources confirming his notability, nor could I find such references with a google search. Is it a hoax, or just a self-aggrandizing autobiography? Or, and I'm stretching good faith as far as I can here, is this a notable person whose sources I simply couldn't find? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
This is not a majority vote. If someone brought this page to your attention, or you brought this page to others' attention, please make a note of this fact here. While widespread participation is encouraged, the primary purpose of this page is to gauge consensus of a representative sample of Wikipedians; therefore, it's important to know whether someone is actively soliciting others from a non-neutral location to discuss. Such contributors are not prohibited from commenting, but it's important for the closing administrator or bureaucrat to know how representative the participants are of Wikipedians generally. See Wikipedia:Canvassing.
- Speedy delete as hoax. Oli Filth(talk) 23:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No secondary source evidence of notability. Kevin (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete per WP:COI. Created by single purpose account, DanN91 for the purposes of self-aggrandisement Ohconfucius (talk) 03:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable bio Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:HOAX. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete per JuJube. Cunard (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete per Ohconfucius. ~ Antiselfpromotion (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
